Lawsuit Between Infowars and Pepe the Frog Creator May Decide Fate of Internet Memes
Matt Furie created Pepe the Frog in 2005 for the comic books "Boy's Club" and "Play Time." The lackadaisical amphibian whose catchphrase was "Feels good, man" first became an Internet meme in 2008.
May 23, 2019 at 01:36 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A lawsuit involving controversial Internet character Pepe the Frog is going to trial, and the result may have ripple effects beyond the “chill frog dude.”
Pepe creator Matt Furie sued Infowars in 2018 for copyright infringement over a poster the company sold on its website. The poster featured Pepe alongside Infowars founder Alex Jones, President Donald Trump, Milo Yiannopoulos and other right-wing figures.
Infowars attempted to get the suit dismissed, asserting that Furie had abandoned his copyright on Pepe. Court filings cite interviews where Furie is quoted as saying, “It's just out of my control, what people are doing with it, and my thoughts on it, are more of amusement,” reports Vice. That amounted to “cumulatively tell[ing] the world that [Furie] consents to the copying, modifying, and distributing of Pepe the Frog, even with commercial use of the character,” argued Infowars.
Infowars also suggested that the Pepe character was derived from an Argentinian cartoon called “El Sapo Pepe,” thereby invalidating Furie's copyright claims. Furie said he'd never heard of the Argentine cartoon.
U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald in California ruled against the “El Sapo Pepe” claim, but said the comments Furie made about the ownership of Pepe was disputed enough to advance the case to trial, according to The Hill.
Furie created Pepe the Frog in 2005 for the comic books “Boy's Club” and “Play Time.” The lackadaisical amphibian whose catchphrase was “Feels good, man” first became an Internet meme in 2008 on the 4chan website, growing in popularity over the years. Pepe was embraced by Donald Trump during the run-up to the 2016 presidential election when the then-candidate tweeted a Pepe-like representation of himself in October 2015. Pepe has since become a fixture of alt-right online communities.
Furie has endeavored to reclaim Pepe in recent years. In 2017, he successfully stopped distribution of a conservative-themed children's book called ”The Adventures of Pepe and Pede,” which featured a frog named Pepe and his centipede sidekick who save a pond from a bearded alligator named Alkah. In 2018, Furie got Pepe images scrubbed from the neo-Nazi website Daily Stormer.
Furie is represented in these matters by a team from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, led by attorneys Louis Tompros and Don Steinberg. They are representing him pro bono. “From our client's perspective, the message that he wants to make clear is that Pepe the Frog does not belong to the alt-right,” said Tompros.
For his part, Alex Jones said in a deposition that he considers Pepe to be “a symbol of free speech … There's now a movement to try to then control and own symbols that have entered the public domain and public use….and so now I see it as basically a tombstone of free speech and fair use in the Western world.”
Commenting on the case on Above the Law, Scheef & Stone attorney Tom Kulik said, “Memes have become a cornerstone of Internet expression. No matter how you may look at it, however, the jury will be rendering a decision that will impact the enforcement of copyrights in the images underlying memes, and therefore, the use and dissemination of them in the process.”
The trial has been scheduled for July 16 in Los Angeles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
An Art Case That Shows the Internet Is Not a Copyright Free-For-All
Bestselling Authors' Lawsuit Against OpenAI Adds Microsoft as Defendant
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250