Prolific ADA Plaintiffs Lawyer in California Indicted on Federal Tax Charges
Scott N. Johnson, owner of Disabled Access Prevents Injury Inc., has filed thousands of lawsuits alleging violations of state and federal disability and civil rights laws.
May 24, 2019 at 04:57 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A prolific disability-rights plaintiffs lawyer was indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday on three counts of submitting false tax returns.
Scott N. Johnson, owner of Disabled Access Prevents Injury Inc. of Carmichael, a suburb of Sacramento, has filed thousands of lawsuits alleging California businesses were violating state and federal disability and civil rights laws.
Federal prosecutors under the leadership of U.S. Attorney McGregor Scott allege Johnson “materially underreported” taxable income he received from settlements and awards over a three-year period.
“By understating his income on his tax returns, Johnson and DAPI paid little to no income tax for tax years 2012, 2013 and 2014,” Scott's office said in a press release. Assistant U.S. Attorney Katherine Lydon in Sacramento is assigned the prosecution, with Timothy Russo, a tax division trial attorney from the U.S. Justice Department in Washington.
Johnson's attorney, Malcolm Segal of Segal and Associates in Sacramento, said in an email that the U.S. Internal Revenue Service “disputes how the relatively small financial settlements [Johnson] received in the process should have been treated for tax purposes, including those payments intended to compensate him for the injuries he suffered trying to gain access to the defendants' businesses. He expects to meet this challenge in a courthouse with which he is quite familiar.”
Johnson is well-known among small businesses and defense attorneys in Northern California for suing establishments for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The paraplegic lawyer has often offered to settle his suits—brought in his name—for between $4,000 and $6,000, less than what it might cost most business owners to fight the claims in court.
Johnson's supporters have said his litigation results in access rights for the disabled and businesses complying with laws that have been on the books for decades. His critics have accused him of targeting mom-and-pop shops over alleged minor violations and seeking quick payments instead of assurances that access changes are made.
Johnson is scheduled to appear for arraignment May 29 in the Sacramento federal courthouse. The charge of filing a false tax return carries a maximum penalty of up to three years in prison.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
'Vision': Judge David Tatel on the Value of Oral Argument and Reading Drafts Aloud
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250