Amid Further Claims by Former Partner, Pierce Bainbridge Retains Marc Mukasey
Former partner Donald Lewis, who was accused of sexual misconduct involving a firm staffer, has accused the firm and its principal of smearing him as an “extortionist."
June 07, 2019 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Donald Lewis, a lawyer involved in dueling litigation with his former colleagues at Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht, has sued the firm again, claiming $75 million in damages for allegedly defaming him in court papers and public statements.
Amid the escalating litigation, Pierce Bainbridge has retained Marc Mukasey, the former Greenberg Traurig shareholder who started his own boutique earlier this year and who represents President Donald Trump in some court matters. In a statement to ALM on Friday, Mukasey called it “an honor to represent” the firm and its partners in their litigation against Lewis.
“It's a first-class law firm made up of terrific lawyers and great people. Don Lewis' allegations are preposterous, meritless and frivolous. If he's looking for a fight, he's got one,” said Mukasey, who is currently in San Diego for the upcoming murder trial of another client, the Navy SEAL Edward Gallagher.
In Lewis' new suit against the firm, filed Friday in Manhattan Supreme Court, Lewis said Pierce Bainbridge's suit against him last month and several LinkedIn posts by global managing partner John Pierce about the dispute smeared his reputation and merit more than $75 million in damages. He said the defendants defamed him and violated New York's Judiciary Law, and he included screenshots of texts, emails, Slack messages and a photo that he said support his version of events.
The latest suit comes about three weeks after Lewis sued his former firm and Putney Twombly Hall & Hirson, the outside law firm that investigated a claim of sexual misconduct about him, over his firing and the probe that preceded it. Pierce Bainbridge responded to the first suit by suing Lewis in Los Angeles Superior Court for civil extortion, among other things.
In Pierce Bainbridge's lawsuit last month, Lewis was accused of masturbating at the firm's offices and of groping a staffer who saw it happening. He has denied those allegations and claims he was fired for blowing the whistle on Pierce's poor stewardship of the firm's money. He said Pierce Bainbridge and Putney Twombly conducted a sloppy and unfair investigation. His former firm said its probe found Lewis' accuser to be “credible.”
Lewis' new suit is intensely personal. Lewis accuses Denver Edwards, the Pierce Bainbridge lawyer who signed the law firm's Los Angeles complaint, of putting his name to “legal garbage.” He calls Pierce “a depraved, desperate, pathological liar with not a shred of human decency,” and accuses his former colleagues of turning a blind eye to issues with Pierce's leadership so they can get paid.
“When [Pierce] feared Lewis would expose him as the fraud and phony that he is, Pierce went in for the kill,” the suit said. “Pierce … went on to call [Lewis] a 'credibly accused sex predator' to a massive audience, including Lewis' Harvard Law School classmates.”
The new suit doesn't just allege defamation, but it includes a claim for violation of Section 487 of New York's Judiciary Law for alleged attorney deceit. It also includes exhibits that Lewis said document more than 50 allegedly false statements by his Pierce, Edwards and his former firm.
“My papers speak for themselves,” Lewis said in an email to ALM. ”Unspeakable and irreparable wrongs have been done to me, but the truth always rises to the top.”
Lewis seeks to substantiate allegations of financial impropriety, attaching what he claims are emails, messages and texts allegedly showing Pierce's assistant complaining about his excessive alcohol consumption, Pierce's ex-wife asking the firm about alimony payments and Lewis and others expressing worry about the firm's spending. Some of the evidence was described in Lewis' first suit.
A representative of Pierce Bainbridge deferred to Mukasey for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250