Greenberg Traurig Can't Duck $1.3M Suit Over 'Gotti' Film Financing
Critics panned the movie and a judge panned the lawsuit. But unlike bad reviews, a court decision can be overturned on appeal.
June 11, 2019 at 04:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Greenberg Traurig must face a $1.3 million lawsuit by a construction executive turned producer of the poorly received 2018 biopic about mobster John Gotti, a New York state appeals court ruled Tuesday.
A panel of New York's Appellate Division, First Department concluded that a trial court judge had erred in dismissing Thomas P. Devlin's suit against the international law firm, finding that Greenberg was responsible for looking out for Devlin's interests, not just those of Fiore Films, the company producing the film.
According to a 2017 complaint, Devlin was a major investor in Fiore, which secured the film rights for the oft-delayed and ultimately panned John Travolta vehicle “Gotti” in 2010.
Devlin alleged in the complaint that not only did Greenberg represent Fiore, but partner Steven Beer also represented a Dubai-based investment company that was also interested in financing the film.
That client, Treasures FZE, was allegedly willing to put up $200 million in financing for “Gotti” and other film projects, on the condition that Fiore put $1.3 million into an escrow account to account for closing costs for the financing. According to the complaint, Devlin and his attorney Michael Froch repeatedly questioned Beer and Greenberg about the propriety of the arrangement before they agreed to complete the transaction.
Then, according to the complaint, while Devlin was on a flight to Zurich to close the financing agreement, Treasures emptied out the escrow account without permission. A criminal complaint filed in New York federal court in 2015 indicates that the figure behind Treasures FZE was actually Scarsdale, New York, resident Sal Carpanzano. Carpanzano eventually pleaded guilty to an eight-count information in 2015 involving the fraud on Fiore and several other frauds.
The terms of his sentence, which was scheduled for September 2018, are under seal, but they include over $10 million in restitution.
While “Gotti” was finally made, Devlin said that Greenberg's failure to product Fiore from being duped ultimately cost him and the company $10 million.
A trial court judge dismissed the suit in July 2018, finding that because Devlin acknowledged that Fiore retained Greenberg, the firm did not have a fiduciary relationship to Devlin himself.
However, the appeals court found that the complaint suggested a deeper relationship between the parties.
“Plaintiff alleges that he—as well as Fiore Films LLC—was defendant's client. He does not base his claim of an attorney-client relationship solely on the fact that he paid the bills that defendant sent to Fiore Films and was a part owner of that entity,” the panel said. “The amended complaint alleges that defendant “knew that [plaintiff] was dependent and was relying on [it] … to provide honest and diligent advice with respect to escrow funds.”
The appeals court did side with Greenberg in concluding that Devlin was not entitled to $10 million in alleged damages. The panel said that while the complaint asserted that the firm's actions tarnished the credibility of Fiore Films, there was no cause of action in the complaint over injuries to Fiore.
Neither New York attorney Gerard McCabe, who represents Devlin, nor Steptoe & Johnson's Justin Yu, who represents Greenberg, immediately responded to requests for comment Tuesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1The End of Innocence? DEP’s End Run Around ‘All Appropriate Inquiry’ Spill Act Protections
- 2Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
- 3New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
- 4Buyer Beware: Continuity of Coverage in Legal Malpractice Insurance
- 5‘Listen, Listen, Listen’: Some Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250