Florida Judge Warns Carnival Execs She'll Consider Jail Time if Compliance Failures Continue
U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz said she'd consider punishing individual executives with criminal fines and prison time over the world's largest cruise line failing to implement meaningful compliance reforms with a chief compliance officer.
June 12, 2019 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Once again a company has felt the pain that comes when it is caught violating an agreement with the Department of Justice. After taking a tongue lashing from a federal judge for repeatedly violating the law, Carnival Corp. executives have until autumn to hire a chief compliance officer and begin meaningful compliance reforms at the world's largest cruise line.
And if they fail again? U.S. District Judge Patricia Seitz has threatened to bar Carnival from docking at U.S. ports, and she said she'd consider punishing individual executives with criminal fines and prison time.
“The concern I have is that senior management has no skin in the game,” Seitz said in the June 3 threats to the executives. “My goal is to have the defendant change its behavior.” The company chairman, CEO, chief financial officer and senior management from each operating cruise line of Carnival were in the courtroom.
Seitz had demanded that the top executives be in the hearing June 3 to hear her ultimatum. A Carnival spokesman and its general counsel, Arnaldo Perez, did not return messages seeking comment Wednesday.
In 2017 Carnival had agreed to pay a record fine of $40 million after a criminal conviction for similar pollution. It signed a probation agreement then that included a promise to name a head compliance officer. It failed to do so while violating several other parts of the deal.
The March issue of Corporate Counsel magazine looked at some dire consequences when companies ignore their own agreements with federal prosecutors. In that article, former federal prosecutor Joan Meyer, now a partner at Baker McKenzie in Washington, D.C., said, “Where there is concern about the speed in which a company is rectifying a bad internal control situation, they [prosecutors] could be more punitive.”
Seitz signed off on a new, tougher probation agreement June 3 after finding Carnival deliberately discharged plastic into Bahamian waters and failed to record the illegal discharges accurately; falsified environmental training records aboard two cruise ships, and sent secret teams to ships to prepare them for required independent inspections.
It pleaded guilty to committing six probation violations, agreed to pay another $20 million criminal penalty, and promised to institute compliance reforms.
The new, three-year probation agreement requires Carnival to:
- Restructure the company's corporate compliance efforts, including appointing a new chief corporate compliance officer.
- Create an executive compliance committee across all cruise lines.
- Add a new member to the board of directors with corporate compliance expertise, and train its board of directors.
- Pay up to $1 million per day if it does not meet a Sept. 13 deadline for some changes, and $10 million a day for not meeting an Oct. 9 deadline for other changes.
- Pay for 15 additional independent audits per year conducted by the third-party auditor and court-appointed monitor, on top of approximately 31 ship audits and six shore-side audits currently performed annually.
- Comply with new reporting requirements, including notifying the government and court of all future violations.
- Make major changes in how the company uses and disposes of plastic and other non-food waste.
U.S. Attorney Ariana Fajardo Orshan for the Southern District of Florida, said in a statement, “A corporation is responsible to its shareholders and board of directors to be profitable, but not by breaking the law and destroying the very environment in which it navigates for profit. Carnival's failure to comply with the terms of its probation, and later its attempt to drown its deceit, goes against the fiber of corporate compliance.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Groundbreaking Defense Win in the Algorithmic Pricing Antitrust Suit Against Vegas Hotels
Notes From an Insurer Win in a Rare Trial Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage Claims
Litigation Leaders: Pryor Cashman Co-Chairs Say Being a Litigator 'Is and Should Be a Passion'
For Trump Org CFO, a Hostile Manhattan Jury Pool Was a Key Driver in Hammering Out a Plea Deal
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250