After Dumping Covington Team, Michael Flynn Hires Mueller-Critic Sidney Powell
Trump's former national security adviser, awaiting sentencing in Washington, will "continue to cooperate with the government in all pending matters."
June 12, 2019 at 12:56 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Michael Flynn, the former Trump administration national security adviser who pleaded guilty to making false statements in a case brought by the special counsel, has retained special counsel critic Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor, as his new lawyer.
Flynn's previous defense team at Covington & Burling withdrew last week, saying Flynn had terminated their service. Court filings in Washington did not give a reason. Flynn's defense had been led by Covington partner Robert Kelner, who chairs the firm's election and political law practice group.
Powell, who is based in Dallas, is a former Justice Department lawyer who has criticized members of Robert Mueller's prosecution team. She is the author of the Enron-focused book titled “Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.” Powell served as an assistant U.S. attorney from 1978 through 1988 in Texas and in Virginia.
“I'm honored to be representing General Flynn and appreciate the trust of him and his family. He is going to continue to cooperate with the government in all pending matters,” Powell said in an email statement.
Powell had not yet entered a formal appearance Wednesday in Flynn's case in Washington's federal trial court. Kelner was not immediately reached for comment. The Hill earlier reported on Wednesday that Powell was representing Flynn.
Powell has appeared on Fox News shows and other conservative media outlets to argue that prosecutors at times have given Democrats “passes” and Republicans “are literally targeted and prosecuted and their lives destroyed on things that are even made up.”
Sidney Powell. Courtesy photoFlynn has been “dragged … through living hell,” Powell said on a conservative radio show in December 2018. “He's been just tortured for all this time.” She added: “Flynn would have cooperated with them from the get-go because that's the kind of person he is. They didn't have to threaten to indict him and indict other members of this family and treat him like a criminal to get his cooperation. He would have cooperated with them because he's an honorable American.”
Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to federal investigators about his contact with ex-Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition. Flynn was the first former Trump administration official to be charged in Mueller's investigation.
Flynn appeared in court in December in Washington for sentencing, but that hearing was delayed when the presiding judge, Emmet Sullivan, raised the specter of a possible prison sentence. Flynn's lawyers agreed to the delay to allow Flynn to show further the extent of his cooperation with the special counsel's prosecution team.
In court then, Sullivan expressed “disdain” about Flynn's actions and questioned whether Flynn “sold out your country.”
“I'm going to be frank with you: This crime is very serious,” Sullivan said at the time, highlighting more than once how Flynn was a high-ranking official who lied to the FBI.
Prosecutors, lauding Flynn's cooperation, have not recommended a prison sentence. Flynn's “early cooperation was particularly valuable because he was one of the few people with long-term and firsthand insight regarding events and issues under investigation by” Mueller.
Powell last year called Sullivan the “judicial hero” of her book on the Enron prosecution. Powell has praised the focus Sullivan put on prosecution ethics in the aftermath of the botched public-corruption case against the late U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens. Sullivan presided over the case against Stevens, which was mired amid claims of prosecutorial abuses and ultimately dismissed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250