Trump Court Pick Eskridge Reveals $5M in Quinn Emanuel Partner Pay Since 2017
Charles Eskridge III, a nominee for a seat in the Southern District of Texas, reported earning $2.3 million in 2018.
June 12, 2019 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Charles Eskridge III, nominated for the Texas federal trial bench, reported earning more than $5 million in partner compensation from the law firm since 2017, according to newly released financial disclosure reports.
Eskridge reported earning $2.3 million in 2018, up slightly from $2.2 million in 2017, according to the disclosure provided by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Average partner compensation at Quinn Emanuel last year was $3.5 million, ninth highest among Am Law 100 firms, according to a review conducted by affiliated publication The American Lawyer.
Eskridge's disclosure offers a rare look into compensation at Quinn Emanuel given the scarcity of court and federal agency nominees Trump has drawn from the firm. Veteran appellate lawyer Christopher Landau, the Trump administration's pick for U.S. ambassador to Mexico, reported earning $3 million at Quinn Emanuel, according to his financial disclosure. Landau left Kirkland & Ellis for Quinn Emanuel in March 2018.
Eskridge, who was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in May, has been a partner at Quinn Emanuel since 2015. He joined the firm's Houston office from Susman Godfrey, where he had been a partner since 1997 after arriving as an associate there.
Eskridge clerked for Justice Byron White during the 1991-1992 term, and clerked for Judge Charles Clark on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit a year earlier. The Texas Lawyer honored Eskridge as a “40 under 40″ rising star in 2001.
Eskridge declined to comment Wednesday. He appeared last week for his confirmation hearing at the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Eskridge joined the Houston chapter of the Federalist Society in 2018. He reported receiving $2,000 in both 2017 and in 2018 in honoraria from the Federalist Society.
Eskridge has spoken about the Magna Carta and its ties to the Constitution and Bill of Rights at various Federalist Society events. Eskridge also participated in an event titled “Originalist Hamilton: The Musical and the Constitution,” speaking at Georgetown Law and the Colorado Lawyers Chapter in 2018 and 2019.
The theme fits within Eskridge's teachings as an adjunct professor at the University of Houston Law Center, a job he plans to keep, according to his Senate questionnaire.
“I anticipate continuing to teach and lecture at the University of Houston Law Center and Pepperdine University School of Law,” Eskridge said in the questionnaire. “I would accept invitations to do so at other law schools to the extent time permitted. l have agreed to teach my class on Origins of the Federal Constitution in Spring 2020 at the University of Houston Law Center.”
Eskridge has litigated complex commercial matters in federal and state courts, according to his questionnaire and law firm bio.
In 2018, he was part of a Quinn Emanuel team that won a $622 million arbitration award against Petrobras on behalf of client Vantage Drilling. The breach-of-contract case included allegations of bribery and an offshore drill ship that costs more than $500,000 per day to lease.
“I have represented both plaintiffs and defendants without a particular emphasis on behalf of either,” Eskridge told the senators. “I have represented individuals, including classes of individuals, against corporations and government entities. I have defended corporations against claims by individuals, including classes of individuals. And I have represented corporations in disputes with other corporations, and individuals in disputes with other individuals.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250