Federal Agency Watchdog Assails 'Repeat Offender' Kellyanne Conway
"If Ms. Conway were any other federal employee, her multiple violations of the law would almost certainly result in removal from her federal position," the U.S. Office of Special Counsel told the Trump White House.
June 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 1:07 p.m.
A federal agency watchdog on Thursday recommended the Trump administration fire counselor Kellyanne Conway for alleged repeated violations of a federal law that restricts government employees from engaging in certain political activities while on work duty.
“Ms. Conway's disregard for the restrictions the Hatch Act places on executive branch employees is unacceptable,” Henry Kerner, the head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, said in a letter to the White House. “If Ms. Conway were any other federal employee, her multiple violations of the law would almost certainly result in removal from her federal position by the Merit Systems Protection Board.”
Kerner continued: “As a highly visible member of the administration, Ms. Conway's violations, if left unpunished, send a message to all federal employees that they need not abide by the Hatch Act's restrictions. Her actions erode the principal foundation of our democratic system—the rule of law.” The office said it “respectfully requests that Ms. Conway be held to the same standards as all other federal employees and, as such, you find removal from federal service to be the appropriate disciplinary action.”
The report called Conway a “repeat offender” of the Hatch Act for using her “official authority to advocate for or against declared candidates for partisan political office.”
The special counsel's office last year criticized Conway in a report alleging ethics violations. At the time, the White House denied Conway had run afoul of Hatch Act provisions. “She simply expressed the president's obvious position that he have people in the House and Senate who support his agenda,” a spokesman said then.
The White House said in a letter to Kerner: “The report is based on numerous grave legal, factual and procedural errors.” The White House said the special counsel's “overbroad and unsupported interpretation of the Hatch Act risks violating Ms. Conway's First Amendment rights and chills the free speech of all government employees.”
“Worst of all, OSC's 'call' upon the president to 'remove Ms. Conway from her federal position immediately' is as outrageous as it is unprecedented,” White House Counsel Pat Cipollone said in the letter. “OSC's overreaching recommendation is wholly unsupported by any statute or the Constitution.”
Conway is married to George Conway, of counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and stalwart critic of the Trump administration. George Conway tweets and writes often in disdain of the president, calling him unfit for office.
On Wednesday, George Conway teamed up with Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal to publish an op-ed at The Washington Post that excoriated Trump's arguments against a U.S. House subpoena that seeks financial records from his accounting firm. “The idea that only the president can investigate the president is an argument for autocrats, not Americans,” the two lawyers wrote.
Kerner is a former aide to the late U.S. Sen. John McCain on the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations, and he earlier served as vice president for investigations at the conservative Cause of Action Institute before the Trump administration nominated him to lead the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
The Office of Special Counsel Report is posted below:
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Read more:
Conservative Big Law Veterans Raise Specter of Trump Impeachment
White House Counsel Pat Cipollone's Financial Disclosure Shows $6.7M Income
Mueller's Restraint, Barr's Press Conference: Here's What Lawyers Are Saying
Kellyanne Conway Should be Disciplined for Ethics Violation, Agency Tells Trump
Trump's Morgan Lewis Tax Lawyer Faces House Scrutiny
Stefan Passantino Punches Back Against Ethics Allegations
This post was updated with comment from the White House.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
- 2MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 3Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 4People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be Open to Opportunities, Ready to Seize Them When They Arise,' Says Lara Shortz of Michelman & Robinson
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250