Federal Agency Watchdog Assails 'Repeat Offender' Kellyanne Conway
"If Ms. Conway were any other federal employee, her multiple violations of the law would almost certainly result in removal from her federal position," the U.S. Office of Special Counsel told the Trump White House.
June 13, 2019 at 12:48 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 1:07 p.m.
A federal agency watchdog on Thursday recommended the Trump administration fire counselor Kellyanne Conway for alleged repeated violations of a federal law that restricts government employees from engaging in certain political activities while on work duty.
“Ms. Conway's disregard for the restrictions the Hatch Act places on executive branch employees is unacceptable,” Henry Kerner, the head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, said in a letter to the White House. “If Ms. Conway were any other federal employee, her multiple violations of the law would almost certainly result in removal from her federal position by the Merit Systems Protection Board.”
Kerner continued: “As a highly visible member of the administration, Ms. Conway's violations, if left unpunished, send a message to all federal employees that they need not abide by the Hatch Act's restrictions. Her actions erode the principal foundation of our democratic system—the rule of law.” The office said it “respectfully requests that Ms. Conway be held to the same standards as all other federal employees and, as such, you find removal from federal service to be the appropriate disciplinary action.”
The report called Conway a “repeat offender” of the Hatch Act for using her “official authority to advocate for or against declared candidates for partisan political office.”
The special counsel's office last year criticized Conway in a report alleging ethics violations. At the time, the White House denied Conway had run afoul of Hatch Act provisions. “She simply expressed the president's obvious position that he have people in the House and Senate who support his agenda,” a spokesman said then.
The White House said in a letter to Kerner: “The report is based on numerous grave legal, factual and procedural errors.” The White House said the special counsel's “overbroad and unsupported interpretation of the Hatch Act risks violating Ms. Conway's First Amendment rights and chills the free speech of all government employees.”
“Worst of all, OSC's 'call' upon the president to 'remove Ms. Conway from her federal position immediately' is as outrageous as it is unprecedented,” White House Counsel Pat Cipollone said in the letter. “OSC's overreaching recommendation is wholly unsupported by any statute or the Constitution.”
Conway is married to George Conway, of counsel at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and stalwart critic of the Trump administration. George Conway tweets and writes often in disdain of the president, calling him unfit for office.
On Wednesday, George Conway teamed up with Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal to publish an op-ed at The Washington Post that excoriated Trump's arguments against a U.S. House subpoena that seeks financial records from his accounting firm. “The idea that only the president can investigate the president is an argument for autocrats, not Americans,” the two lawyers wrote.
Kerner is a former aide to the late U.S. Sen. John McCain on the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations, and he earlier served as vice president for investigations at the conservative Cause of Action Institute before the Trump administration nominated him to lead the U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
The Office of Special Counsel Report is posted below:
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Stefan Passantino Punches Back Against Ethics Allegations
|This post was updated with comment from the White House.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
Trending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250