Nokia, Daimler, Continental Ramp Up Global Fight Over Connected Car Patents
Continental made the latest move Wednesday, asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathaneal Cousins of San Jose to block Nokia from pursuing patent infringement actions against Daimler in three different German courts.
June 14, 2019 at 06:50 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Auto maker Daimler AG, parts supplier Continental AG and technology licensing company Nokia are playing a global chess match over patents essential to connected cars.
Continental made the latest move Wednesday, asking U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathaneal Cousins of San Jose to block Nokia from pursuing patent infringement actions against Daimler in three different German courts. Continental's motion for an anti-suit injunction contends that Nokia is threatening to disrupt Daimler's automobile production before Cousins can decide whether Nokia is licensing its 2G, 3G and 4G patents on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms.
“The purpose of Nokia's German lawsuits is to pressure Daimler to accept a license on non-FRAND terms by using the threat of an injunction to stop automobile production, and the financial burden of litigating Nokia's scattershot infringement actions,” states the motion, which is signed by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton partner Matthew Holder.
Nokia, which has licensed Germany's other two major auto makers through the Avanci licensing platform, has said that it's committed to honoring its FRAND obligations and that Daimler is simply holding out from taking a license.
The dispute has been brewing since 2017, when Nokia and Avanci approached Daimler about licensing its standard-essential patents (SEPs), according to Continental's motion. Continental, which markets telematics control units to Daimler and other auto makers, says it told Nokia it wanted to negotiate, but was rebuffed. “As the parties responsible for implementing the technology, component suppliers are in a much better position than OEMs to determine whether or not a given component practices a patented technology,” Holder writes in Wednesday's motion.
In March of this year, Daimler, Continental and suppliers Bury and Valeo complained to the European Commission that Nokia was shirking its FRAND commitments. Nokia said the complaint was “simply the latest in a long series of actions to avoid taking a license,” and sued Daimler for patent infringement in Munich, Dusseldorf and Mannheim. In May it moved to enjoin Daimler from practicing its patents without a license.
Continental sued Nokia, Avanci and three other licensing companies two days later, accusing them of collusively refusing to license at the supplier level. But instead of doing so in Germany, Continental sued in the San Jose division of the Northern District of California, where U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh just ordered Qualcomm Inc. to license its chips to other chip suppliers.
Now Continental is asking Cousins to put the German infringement suits on hold. Holder is using Koh's opinion in FTC v. Qualcomm as Exhibit A, pointing to her finding that Nokia “follow[ed] Qualcomm's lead” in refusing to license at the supplier level.
Nokia, Holder writes, is trying to force Daimler to knuckle under before the court can rule that Nokia must make licenses available on FRAND terms to Continental, “similar to the relief granted by Koh in the FTC v. Qualcomm matter.”
Sheppard Mullin has had success with this argument before. In 2015 partner Stephen Korniczky, the lead lawyer on Continental's team, persuaded U.S. District Judge James Selna to issue an anti-suit injunction that blocked Ericsson from pursuing litigation against handset maker TCL Communications in France, the U.K., Brazil and Russia.
More recently some judges have been pouring cold water on anti-suit injunctions. Qualcomm lost a bid for one against Apple Inc. before Judge Gonzalo Curiel in 2017. Judge William Orrick III granted one to Samsung last year in its licensing dispute with Huawei, but the Federal Circuit sounded poised to overturn it during oral arguments last fall, and Samsung settled a couple months later.
Alston & Bird partner Ryan Koppelman represents Nokia in the Northern District of California. He did not immediately respond to an email requesting comment Friday afternoon. Avanci, which has called Continental's suit “meritless,” recently substituted a Winston & Strawn team in place of attorneys at Baker McKenzie.
Nokia states on its website that “injunctions with SEPs should not be enforced to prevent the implementation of a standard subject to FRAND undertakings, unless a patent holder has made a FRAND license available and the prospective licensee has been unwilling to enter into such FRAND license or to comply with its terms.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Rolling Back Elon Musk's $56B Tesla Compensation Package
Litigators of the Week: Quinn Emanuel Slashes $137M Racial Discrimination Verdict Against Tesla by Nearly 98%
Litigators of the Week: Defense Verdict Secured By Quinn Emanuel in Multibillion Securities Trial Over Musk's Go-Private Tweets
Trending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250