Latham, 1, Neo-Nazis, 0
Litigators from Latham & Watkins prevailed on behalf of SiriusXM radio host and comedian Dean Obeidallah, who sued The Daily Stormer's Andrew Anglin for libel in 2017 in the Southern District of Ohio.
June 18, 2019 at 02:49 PM
3 minute read
I like to applaud pro bono work of all stripes—but when it results in a multi-million dollar judgment against Andrew Anglin, the publisher of the most widely read neo-Nazi website on the internet, The Daily Stormer, I say bravo.
Litigators from Latham & Watkins last week prevailed on behalf of Dean Obeidallah, a writer, political commentator, SiriusXM radio host and comedian, who sued Anglin for libel in 2017 in the Southern District of Ohio.
On June 13, Chief U.S. District Judge Edmund Sargus Jr. found that Anglin acted with actual malice and published statements “with reckless disregard for the truth.” The judge awarded Obeidallah $4.1 million in damages.
As a columnist, I'm not necessarily a big fan of libel suits, but if ever one was justified, this is it.
On June 1, 2017, Anglin published an article on the Daily Stormer headlined “Dean Obeidallah, Mastermind Behind Manchester Bombing, Calls on Trump to Declare Whites the Real Terrorists.”
The article claimed that Obeidallah planned and executed the terrorist attack at the Ariana Grande concert that killed 23 and injured 250; that he celebrated their deaths; that he encouraged others to carry out similar attacks; and that he fled to Syria.
None of this is true.
Some context: The Daily Stormer touts itself as “REAL NEWS” and views itself as competing with CNN and The New York Times. Also (this is depressing) from May 13 to June 12, 2017, the “dailystormer.com” was visited approximately 3.18 million times, according to the complaint. During the same time period, C-SPAN got 2.64 million visits. I'm not even going to say how many hits litigationdaily.com got. Let's just say it was also less.
To lend an air of verisimilitude, the Daily Stormer article included fabricated Twitter messages mixed in with real ones from Obeidallah's account, and referenced his actual writings and guests.
“Mr. Obeidallah is an ardent believer in and defender of the First Amendment. He recognizes the importance of freedom of speech and political discourse, regardless of viewpoint. But the First Amendment does not license defamation,” states the complaint by Latham's Abid Qureshi and Christopher Fawal plus lawyers from Muslim Advocates and The Chandra Law Firm in Cleveland.
Anglin “published false factual statements and fabricated evidence on the Daily Stormer that was meant to—and did, in fact—harm Mr. Obeidallah's reputation and business, jeopardize his physical safety, and cause emotional distress and suffering,” they wrote.
The judgment was by default—Anglin and his company Moonbase Holdings never entered an appearance.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1'Don't F-- With Me in My Court:' Texas Judge in Hot Water
- 2Special Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
- 3Appeals Court Rejects Trump Attempt to Delay Friday Sentencing
- 4Strategic Pricing: Setting the Billable Hour at the Intersection of Psychology, Feedback and Growth
- 5'Taking the Best' of Both Firms, Ballard Spahr and Lane Powell Officially Merge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250