Prosecutors Say Roger Stone 'Continues to Fan the Flames' Despite Gag Order
Federal prosecutors argue Stone should face a hearing over whether new social media posts violate the terms of his release and a gag order.
June 20, 2019 at 04:51 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Federal prosecutors are accusing longtime Donald Trump confidante Roger Stone of violating a court-imposed gag order by commenting about his case on social media.
In court papers filed Thursday, federal prosecutors in Washington asked U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia to set a hearing to confront Stone about social media posts that the government contends violate the conditions of his release in a pending criminal case.
Prosecutors accused Stone of violating Jackson's gag order by making statements on Instagram and Facebook about the special counsel's investigation. The posts were aimed at national media by tagging publications like The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and Wall Street Journal.
The posts referred to government corruption discovered by Stone's legal team and the “Russian hoax,” and the FBI's refusal to turn any emails between the FBI and CNN from the day he was arrested. Stone previously came under fire for posts on social media, including one that included a cross hair over Jackson's head.
“But these posts are arguably even worse, because they risk tainting the jury pool with information that is not relevant but that may appear, to some, to be relevant,” prosecutors said in Thursday's court filing. “At best, Stone's efforts could create the misimpression that this case is about issues that are not charged in the indictment, and risk the trial 'devolv[ing] into a circus.' But worse, it could confuse prospective jurors or color how they later view the actually-relevant evidence and understand the court's instructions about that evidence.”
Prosecutors argued that Jackson's orders restricting Stone's speech have not worked. Stone “nonetheless continues to fan the flames,” the government said.
Stone's defense lawyers pushed back Thursday, saying their client limited his comments to widely reported news and court filings.
“We are disappointed in, and surprised by, the government's unrealized fears,” said Grant Smith of Fort Lauderdale-based StrategySmith. “Mr. Stone has limited his comments to matters widely reported in the news or public court filings. The government's motion is ill advised and an astonishing overreaction.”
Stone's legal team includes also includes Robert Buschel of Buschel & Gibbons, Bruce Rogow and Tara Campion.
Stone is fighting charges that he lied to congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election, obstructed justice and tampered with a witness. Prosecutors working under special counsel Robert Mueller III and the U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., Jessie Liu, contend Stone lied to conceal efforts he and Trump campaign officials made in 2016 to get information from WikiLeaks about the release of hacked Democratic Party emails.
After Stone was indicted in January, Jackson placed a limited order that prohibited Stone from making public statements near the courthouse that would “pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.” But he was otherwise allowed to speak freely with the media.
Jackson expanded that gag order in February after Stone made a post on Instagram that featured a crosshair near the judge's face. Defense lawyers apologized to Jackson for the “improper photograph and comment.” At a court hearing, Stone asked for a second chance. “It was a stupid, egregious mistake,” he said.
“Mr. Stone fully understands the power of words and the power of symbols and there's nothing ambiguous about crosshairs,” Jackson said.
That expanded order prohibits Stone from speaking publicly about the special counsel's investigation, his case or any of the participants. Stone was also barred from participating in interviews, press conferences or releases, or social media posts, but is permitted to solicit donations for his legal defense fund.
The government's notice is filed below:
[falcon-embed src="embed_1"]
Read more:
Roger Stone's Lawyers Were in Court Today. It Didn't Go Well
Judge Bench Slaps, Gags Stone Over Hostile Instagram Post
Roger Stone's Apology for 'Crosshairs' Instagram Post Wasn't Enough for Judge
'Urgent,' 'Problematic': Stone's Attorneys Scrambled After Gag Order Scolding
Amy Berman Jackson Warns Stone This Is 'Not a Public Relations Campaign'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250