Conservative Lawyers (Including George Conway) Condemn Trump's 'Ignorant Racist Nature'
"We refuse to share the silence of most of the Republican caucus in Congress, whose timidity in the face of this abhorrent behavior reflects the debased politics of the day," the group Checks and Balances said in a statement.
July 15, 2019 at 06:27 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A group of libertarian and conservative lawyers that formed to counter alleged transgressions of legal norms by the Trump administration issued a statement Monday condemning tweets from the president that urged four minority female Democratic House members to “go back” to their home countries.
Trump's tweets, saying four freshmen members of the U.S. House should “fix” their home countries before criticizing the U.S., deeply angered Democrats but left Republicans largely silent. All four of the lawmakers are U.S. citizens, and three of them were born in the United States.
The lawyers' group Checks and Balances, whose members include George Conway, the husband of Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway, lambasted Trump's statements as a “rejection” of the country's founding principles.
“We refuse to share the silence of most of the Republican caucus in Congress, whose timidity in the face of this abhorrent behavior reflects the debased politics of the day,” the statement said. “We add our voices to those who condemn the President's ignorant racist nature and urge all citizens of whatever party to join us in rejecting a politics of division that is an affront to the rule of law.”
In addition to George Conway, of counsel to Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, other signatories included Harvard Law School professor Charles Fried, a former Reagan administration U.S. solicitor general; John Bellinger, former State Department legal adviser in the George W. Bush administration who now leads Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer's global law and public policy practice; Donald Ayer, a former Justice Department lawyer and retired Jones Day partner; Peter Keisler of Sidley Austin, a former U.S. solicitor general; and Kirkland & Ellis partner Andrew Sagor, a former State Department official.
In 2016, Sagor, formerly at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, said he “never envisioned voting for Hillary Clinton, but I will do so and it will not be a difficult decision given the choice that is before us.” Ayer in recent weeks has written extensively on Robert Mueller's Russia report, urging the special counsel to publicly address whether he thinks Trump committed a crime. Keisler and Bellinger appeared recently on an amicus brief as opposing the Trump administration's border-wall funding.
The statement said that the signatories “speaks and acts solely in our individual capacities, and our views should not be attributed to any organization we may be affiliated with.”
As House Democrats on Monday moved to formally rebuke Trump over his incendiary tweets, the president denied his statements were racist. “It doesn't concern me because many people agree with me,” Trump told reporters at the White House.
One of the four House Democrats targeted by Trump, Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, told reporters late Monday that Trump's tweets were “the agenda of white nationalists … This is his plan to put us against one another,” The Washington Post reported.
Checks and Balances said in its statement that “as conservatives or libertarians, we have profound disagreements with the policies advocated by the Congressional targets of Trump's tweets. But they, like all Americans, are entitled to be treated with respect.”
Writing in an op-ed column at The Washington Post on Monday, George Conway said: “Naivete, resentment and outright racism, roiled in a toxic mix, have given us a racist president. Trump could have used vile slurs, including the vilest of them all, and the intent and effect would have been no less clear.”
|The full Checks and Balances statement is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Election Day Shout-Outs to Litigators Working Pro Bono on Voting Rights
Litigator of the Week: In Election Law and Arbitration Cases, Big Wins for Neal Katyal and Hogan Lovells at SCOTUS
Former Kagan Clerk Elizabeth Wilkins Joins Biden White House Senior Staff
5 minute readBig Law Attorneys Outside Georgia Are Pouring Money Into Senate Candidate Races
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justices to Decide if Fuel Industry Can Sue Over California’s EV Rules
- 2Delivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
- 3The Buzbee Law Firm Accused of Client Abuse in Two Louisiana Lawsuits
- 4Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
- 5Foreign Ownership Laws Blocked by Federal Judge in Blow to State Attorney General
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250