Daily Dicta: PNC Slapped with $102M Judgment in Funeral Scam Suit
The judgment stems from a massive Ponzi scheme selling prepaid funerals to almost 100,000 consumers in 16 states.
July 16, 2019 at 11:36 AM
5 minute read
I've been touched by the many notes and expressions of condolences I've received from Lit Daily readers after I wrote last week about the death of my mother-in-law. Thank you—it's much appreciated.
This is the first time my husband and I have been in the position of arranging a memorial service, and as expected, it's a difficult and exhausting job.
It also means that when I came across this lawsuit—which stems from a massive Ponzi scheme selling prepaid funerals to almost 100,000 consumers in 16 states—well, it was always going to make me angry, but right now, it makes my blood absolutely boil.
The latest development: A federal judge in Missouri just ordered PNC Bank and National City Bank to pay $102 million in damages and interest for their role in enabling the scheme.
The roots of the case go back to 1979, when the Cassity family of St. Louis founded National Prearranged Services, or NPS. According to the FBI, which secured criminal convictions against six defendants, NPS targeted customers looking to save their families the expense and stress of arranging their eventual funerals.
NPS and the customer would agree on a package of prepaid services and a price, and NPS would make arrangements with the customer-designated funeral home. The funds to cover the service were placed with a third party—a financial institution or life insurance company (which would put the money back in a life insurance policy in the customer's name).
So far, it all sounds very reasonable, very considerate—a welcome option for those who want to exercise some control over their final arrangements without burdening their families.
But according to the FBI, NPS “didn't put all of the funds from customers into a trust or life insurance policy, but instead brazenly altered application documents—i.e., changing deposit amounts, naming itself as a beneficiary, converting whole life insurance policies to term life—and used the money for unauthorized purposes like risky investments, payments for existing funeral claims, and personal enrichment.”
In the words of Frenchy from the musical “Grease,” they're not just rats—they're “fleas on rats, worse than that, they're amoebas on fleas on rats. I mean, they're too low for even the dogs to bite.”
Represented by Denver's Reilly Pozner, the plaintiffs—nationwide life and health guarantee associations and a Texas receiver who've been stuck covering $600 million in liabilities—sued 35 defendants in 2009 in the Eastern District of Missouri, including nine banking and accounting firms.
In their original 138-page complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that the banks failed to properly supervise the assets of the trusts and allowed them to be “pillaged.”
After a trip to the Eighth Circuit, which concluded that the claims arose under trust law rather than tort law, the case was back before U.S. District Senior Judge E. Richard Webber.
All the other defendants settled, including Southwest Bank and Marshall and Ilsley Trust Company, both represented by Winston & Strawn and Armstrong Teasdale; U.S. Bank, represented by Stinson LLP; Bank of America, represented by Bryan Cave; and Comerica Bank and Trust, represented by Dykema Gossett
Only PNC, which was sued as successor to Allegiant Bank, took the case to trial. The bank was represented until 2018 by Williams & Connolly and Thompson Coburn, and defended at trial by Missouri's Dowd Bennett.
“Allegiant did nothing to ensure the prudence of investments,” wrote John McHugh of Reilly Pozner in court papers. “Allegiant did not evaluate a single wire transfer request received to determine the purpose of the wire and thus was unable to monitor if the wire transfers were actually investments. Allegiant never tracked any wire of money out of the trust to determine if an asset was received in exchange.”
After a four-week bench trial, Webber on July 3 awarded $72 million in damages, $15 million in pre-judgment interest and $15 million in punitive damages, for a total of $102 million.
PNC outside counsel James Bennett of Dowd Bennett referred a request for comment to PNC, which said that the matter “involves issues arising more than 15 years ago at a bank acquired by National City, and years before PNC acquired National City in 2009.”
The Reilly Pozner trial team included Daniel Reilly, Clare Pennington, Larry Pozner, Michael Robertson, John McHugh, Robert Kelly, Farrell Carfield, Tony Giacomini, Stephen Segall and St. Louis local counsel Marcy Graham.
“We sought recovery for losses to the trust, pre-judgment interest and punitive damages and the court awarded a substantial amount for each of those elements of damage totaling more than $100 million,” said Reilly. “This was a true team effort, starting with our clients who have been unwavering in their effort to recover the losses that resulted from the bank trustee's failure to meet its fiduciary duties to protect the trust funds.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/27/8e/0c08a95a4ce3b87c07f5ed414734/jeffery-lula-767x633.jpg)
An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
![Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2024/09/Spehr-Goldenberg-Gleeson-767x633.jpg)
Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
![Litigators of the Week: Second Circuit Tells Argentina to Turn Over More Than $300M to Bondholders Litigators of the Week: Second Circuit Tells Argentina to Turn Over More Than $300M to Bondholders](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2024/08/Bash-Hranitzky-Loomis-767x633.jpg)
Litigators of the Week: Second Circuit Tells Argentina to Turn Over More Than $300M to Bondholders
![How One of the World's Largest Institutional Investors Approaches Litigation How One of the World's Largest Institutional Investors Approaches Litigation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2024/05/Beata-Gocyk-Farber-767x633.jpg)
How One of the World's Largest Institutional Investors Approaches Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250