Insurer Wants Out of Civil Suit Against Imprisoned Child Molester
The Hartford Insurance Co. asked a federal judge to declare that it has no duty to defend a civil suit brought by the mother and young victim of an 89-year-old Gainesville violin teacher who pleaded guilty to child molestation.
July 17, 2019 at 06:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
Two years after an 89-year-old violin teacher was sentenced to 30 years in prison for multiple counts of child molestation, the insurer for the Gainesville music school he operated is asking a court to absolve it from liability for a civil suit filed by one of the victims.
Leon Messerlian was 85 when Hall County authorities arrested him in 2015 on charges including child molestation, sexual battery and enticing a child for indecent purposes. The charges came after a 12-year-old student at his Oxford Academy of Classical Studies accused him of improperly touching him. Subsequent allegations from other students soon followed, and he pleaded guilty to multiple counts in 2017.
Messerlian is currently incarcerated at Calhoun State Prison.
In 2018, a plaintiff identified as “A.P.,” and her son “M.P.,” who first raised concerns about Messarlian, sued him in Hall County State Court, saying the teacher fondled the child, forced him to touch Masserlian's genitals and showed him pornographic images from 2011 to 2015.
The complaint was later amended to add Masserlian's wife, Norma Masserlian, as a defendant, claiming she knew about her husband's abuse and helped conceal it, destroyed evidence and refused to testify against him.
The suit levels claims for assault and battery, conspiracy, fraud and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. It seeks damages for M.P.'s medical expenses and treatment.
The Hartford Insurance Co. filed a declaratory judgment action against the Messerians in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on July 10 asking to court to declare it has no duty to provide the $100,000 in coverage it carries for the Messerlians' home in Clermont.
For one thing, the complaint said, no notice was given to the insurer until more than 3.5 years after A.P. “first became aware of the events giving rise to the underlying lawsuit and Leon H. Messerlian's arrest and more than a year after M.P. and A.P. filed the underlying lawsuit” against Messerlian.
It also said the coverage was barred by exclusions in the policy for intentional acts, incidents that occurred in businesses not located on the property and a specific exclusion for bodily injury or property damage “arising out of sexual molestation, corporal punishment or physical or mental abuse.”
The complaint was filed by Seth Friedman and Christopher Meeks of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, who did not respond to request for comment Wednesday.
The Daily Report was unable to reach Norma Messerlian or the lawyer who represented her husband in the criminal action.
Matthew Cook of Gainesville's Cook Law Group, who represents A.P. and M.P., said the insurer's suit was news to him, and the first response he's had to the suit from anyone except the Messerlians.
“The perpetrator and his wife have answered our complaint,” he said, and are apparently representing themselves.
“We took his deposition and the wife's deposition, but the insurance company hasn't even provided a lawyer,” said Cook. “This is a very serious case; this man spent a lot of money on his criminal defense.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFirefighter-Turned-Lawyer Jake Gardener Takes Up Insurance Fight For NYC Retirees
Erin Ziaja of NFP Corp. on Striking a Balance Between an Analytical Approach and Trusting Your Gut
Notes From an Insurer Win in a Rare Trial Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Coverage Claims
Trending Stories
- 1'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 2Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 3A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 4Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 5Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250