NY Judge Nixes Class Cert for Suit Claiming Whole Foods Charges Too Much
U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York on Wednesday granted summary judgment in favor of Whole Foods, finding that plaintiff Sean John lacked standing to bring his claims.
July 17, 2019 at 06:01 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Manhattan federal judge has released Whole Foods Market Group Inc. from a proposed class alleging that the popular supermarket chain had overcharged its customers for prepacked foods at New York City stores.
U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer of the Southern District of New York on Wednesday granted summary judgment in favor of Whole Foods, finding that plaintiff Sean John lacked standing to bring his claims. According to the ruling, John had provided “literally no evidence” to show that he had personally overpaid for products he bought from the grocer between 2014 and 2015.
Instead, Engelmayer said, John had relied solely on the findings of a 2015 investigation by the city Department of Consumer Affairs, which concluded from a sampling of stores that the company “routinely overstated the weights” of its prepackaged products.
Whole Foods later settled with the DCA, agreeing to pay $500,000 and implement policies governing the accuracy of its prices and labels. The company said any mislabeling had been the product of “simple human error” and not the result of any intentional misconduct.
Engelmayer in 2015 dismissed John's suit on similar grounds, but was reversed on appeal. Though it expressed concerns about John's ultimate ability to prove his injury, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit said it was too early at the dismissal stage to determine the scope of Whole Foods' alleged overcharging.
On remand, John pointed to 22 debit card purchases he made at Whole Foods stores in Manhattan between 2014 and 2015, but could not produce any labels or photographic evidence of the goods he bought, Engelmayer said. John brought the lawsuit, he said, after he saw online “blurbs” referencing the DCA probe.
“The court finds that the evidence adduced could not support a verdict in John's favor,” Engelmayer wrote in a 40-page opinion. “Although John's testimony can establish that he purchased cupcakes and cheeses from two Whole Foods stores, there is no competent, non-speculative evidence that any cupcakes or cheese item John bought weighed less than the weight used to purchase it.”
Engelmayer said that without any particularized evidence to John's claims, John could not use only the DCA's findings to extrapolate a widespread practice of short-weighting that would have impacted his purchases.
Whole Foods was represented by Gregory J. Casas and David Sellinger of Greenberg Traurig. Casas is administrative shareholder in Greenberg Traurig's Austin, Texas, office and Sellinger is a New Jersey-based litigation shareholder.
Attorneys for Whole Foods did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.
While the dismissal came on standing grounds, Engelmayer said he would have ruled against him on the merits too.
“Viewed in the light most favorable to John, the DCA results support only that some indeterminate portion of the pre-packed goods at some Whole Foods stores, during the period of the DCA's review, were short-weight,” he said. “Under the case law, given the absence of any evidence specific to John's purchases, that fact does not come close to giving rise to a material dispute of fact as to whether he was injured.”
John was represented by Kim Eleazer Richman and Michael Mietlicki of Richman Law Group in New York City and Andrew Charles White and Jeremiah Lee Frei-Pearson of Finkelstein, Blankinship, Frei-Pearson & Garber in White Plains, New York.
Lawyers for the proposed class did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.
The case was captioned In re Whole Foods Market Group.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After Two Big Wins for Plaintiffs, a Defense Verdict for Infant Formula Makers
Litigators of the Week: King & Spalding Gets 2nd Circuit to Uphold 'All Natural' Win For Kind Bar Maker
How Overseeing Legal Operations Has Affected How Steve Mahieu of Kraft Heinz Looks at Litigation
Litigators of the Week: Proskauer Scores a Defense Win for Last Defendant Standing in Broiler Chicken Antitrust Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250