Daily Dicta: In Memoriam: Lawyers in Love
If Judith represented the changing face of the legal profession, then Bill was a throwback to an earlier, more genteel era.
July 21, 2019 at 12:51 PM
5 minute read
I'm afraid I have more sad personal news. My father-in-law William Winship died on Friday, 12 days after my mother-in-law Judith.
If Judith represented the changing face of the legal profession—a woman who wanted to be a lawyer her whole life but was discouraged by her parents, then put herself through law school in middle age and got an in-house job on Wall Street—then Bill was a throwback to an earlier, more genteel era.
He graduated from Yale Law School in 1958 and was hired by New York trusts and estates boutique Davidson, Dawson & Clark, which back then made a point of hiring one new associate a year from Yale.
In those days, DD&C took pride in matching the going rate that big firms such as Simpson Thacher and Sullivan & Cromwell paid new associates. That meant Bill's starting salary was a handsome $6,000 a year.
And then, Bill stayed at the firm for the next 40 years, retiring in 1998. He loved his colleagues and his clients—why go anywhere else?
In many ways, it was a kinder and gentler time to practice law—before everyone knew everybody's profits per partner, where lateral moves were the exception rather than the rule, where when you left the office at the end of the day, you weren't on call all night.
Consider this passage from an informal history of DD&C, which was founded in 1949 as a spin-off from Carter, Ledyard & Milburn: “From inception, Saturday was not a working day at the firm, evidence of the 'gentlemanly' way in which the firm expected to conduct its law practice. At most firms all employees were expected to be in the office on Saturday until noon or 1:00 p.m. Further, it was [founding partner Sidney Davidson's] practice to disappear from July 1st through Labor Day to spend the summer at his camp on Sebec Lake in Maine.”
Not working remotely, checking email five times a day and reachable by cell phone … just away. Can you imagine?
To be sure, it was a world dominated by white men. One anecdote from the firm's history about recruiting new associates illustrates this—and also an evolving awareness of the notion of diversity.
“The interviews at law schools led to invitations to the 'best and brightest' to visit the firm at its offices. On those occasions the young man or woman would be delivered at regular intervals to a rotation of partners and associates. Then, at lunch time, a small group would gather to take the recruit to lunch.
We loved these occasions, in part because the firm paid for the lunch. One day an interviewing law student was in the office for interviews and several of us were to take him to lunch. He was meeting with Bill Winship about noon, and as the rest of us gathered in the hall outside Bill's office, we heard the young man ask Bill if the lawyers in the firm were 'diverse.'
Bill advised him that surely we were; there might not be a lot of informal fol de rol during the working day, but each lawyer was surely an 'individual.' With that, we entered and they rose to go to lunch. When we opened the closet door to retrieve our coats (lawyers, of course, work with their coats off) there was a little commotion as each retrieved 'his' coat. The point is that all the coats in the closet were exactly the same shade of gray … So much for being individuals!”
Bill, however, was one of a kind. He was incredibly funny, with a deadpan wit. Sometimes humor can have an edge of cruelty, but with Bill, never. He was one of the kindest people I ever met—brilliant but modest, with a love for coffee, The New Yorker magazine, and finding discarded treasures on the streets of Manhattan such as old tables or mirrors and refurbishing them.
As DD&C partner Andrew Tansey put it, “Bill was remarkable and a role model to me in cutting through the excesses of process and posturing right to the core and substance of a matter where his practicality, intuition and most significantly generous and compassionate heart would invariably lead to the right result.”
As much as Bill enjoyed his work, where he carved out an expertise in tax-related issues, his true passion was for his wife and family. After Judith died, I think he was ready to go too.
I'm going to be taking the next few days off, but will be back in time to pick the Litigator of the Week, so please do send nominations.
And if you are fortunate enough to have your parents still alive … give them a call. Tell them you love them.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250