David Boies Battles On Against Jeffrey Epstein
The high-profile lawyer rejects the idea that representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims is a "redemption tour" after receiving criticism for his role in the Harvey Weinstein scandal.
July 26, 2019 at 03:43 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
If David Boies is giving it away, why wouldn't you take it?
I'm talking about his pro bono representation of sex trafficking victims in the Jeffrey Epstein matter. Boies and his firm Boies Schiller Flexner are emerging as the go-to lawyers for women allegedly victimized by the billionaire pedophile. Currently, the firm is representing at least eight of the female victims. And that number is expected to swell.
“With the publicity about Epstein, more women have been calling us,” Boies told me during a recent phone chat. “Some are looking for guidance, and some are still very wary of Epstein's power, and, frankly, wary of the government.”
Boies cast as the knight in shining armor is a familiar trope. But before we get into his role in the Epstein fiasco, let's first deal with that elephant in the room, meaning this: Is Boies representing victims of sex trafficking to salvage his brand?
Sure, that's a cynical question, but that's what people ask me when I mention Boies' involvement.
It's been a rough two years for the star litigator. He suffered a terrible personal loss earlier this year. On the professional front, Boies lost a chunk of his halo when his role in the Harvey Weinstein scandal came to light in the fall of 2017. During his representation of the movie mogul, Boies personally signed the contract to retain Black Cube, an investigative agency hired to thwart the publication of an article in the New York Times about Weinstein's abuse of women. (He claimed that he did it unthinkingly at the client's behest.) Overnight, it seemed, Boies got caught in the #MeToo net, getting labeled as another highly paid enabler of a powerful ogre.
So back to that pesky question: Is Boies going to battle for Epstein's victims a redemption tour?
Boies sounded slightly pained when I posed that question. “We started this long before Weinstein was controversial,” he answered. “When we started representing Weinstein, he was a highly respected producer.”
In fact, his firm started representing Epstein's victim Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe #3) in 2014, practically eons before Weinstein became the poster boy for male toxicity. The firm sued Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein cohort, on Roberts' behalf for defamation. In 2017, it took on Sarah Ransome as a client, suing Epstein for sex trafficking. Both cases have settled. And now there's a pending suit by Roberts against Alan Dershowitz for defamation. (Look out for my post on that soon.)
Boies also stressed that the Epstein matter represents a continuation of his firm's pro bono priorities: “Sex trafficking and the abuse of women have been major pro bono efforts of our firm, so this was something that fit.” He pointed out that his firm has a history of representing sex trafficking victims, citing its role in suing Backpage.com, a site that enabled child prostitution. (Law.com's Jenna Greene reported last year that the firm, working with Legal Momentum, succeeded in shutting down the site, after a two-year fight.)
He added: “Anyone who says that I'm doing this for some kind of redemption has another agenda.”
OK, I posed the elephant question, so I moved on. Why, I asked, of the myriad pro bono requests he and his firm must get, is representing Epstein's victims so compelling?
Boies said it galled him how Epstein was able to flout justice. “It was absolutely astonishing that he had a sex trafficking ring and could walk the street. It represented a serious breakdown of our legal system.”
Moreover, “sex trafficking doesn't get the attention it deserves,” said Boies. “It doesn't touch most homes as other #MeToo activities do. Politicians and the media find it harder to identify with victims of sex trafficking who come from the most vulnerable parts of our society: primarily girls without resources, who aren't highly educated and are suspicious of authority.”
I was also curious if Boies is personally involved in this high-profile matter and how much time, money and resources all this representation is sucking up.
“This has been a major project for me in the last five years,” said Boies, who also credited his partner Sigrid McCawley's deep involvement. He said the firm had to assemble “a good size team” (including Meredith Schultz, Josh Schiller, Ben Margulis, Andrew Villacastin, Andrew Marrero and Sandra Perkins) because “Epstein has a huge team and is paying the legal fees of other defendants.” (In a separate conversation, McCawley confirmed that the case against Epstein's cohort Maxwell was extremely hard-fought. “The other side was well-funded. We argued over 50 motions. I was in court every week,” she said.)
And what's this costing Boies Schiller? “The firm has spent millions of dollars worth of legal fees and hundreds of thousands of dollars in expenses” over the last five years, he said.
As for the next stage of the Epstein matter, Boies is leaving us with a cliffhanger: “When the Second Circuit unseals the records in the Maxwell case [the defamation suit brought by Roberts], people will get a sense of the magnitude.” He added, “Epstein will be in jail for a very long time. And his confederates will be charged. This is only the beginning.”
Well, that sounds ominous.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
- 1Can a Law Firm Institutionalize Its Culture? Boies Schiller’s New Chairman Will Try
- 2Full 8th Circuit Hears First Amendment Challenge to School District’s ‘Equity Training’
- 3Exploring Generative AI’s Impact on Intellectual Property
- 4Training Lawyers in AI and Using AI to Boost Training
- 5EB-5 Rebounds After a Rocky Year: Challenges of 2024 Lay Groundwork for a Booming 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250