Report: Securities Fraud Claims Remain High, and Insurance Rates Will Follow
The Securities Class Action Filings—2019 Midyear Assessment, released Thursday by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, shows that plaintiffs filed 198 new federal securities class actions in the first half of 2019.
July 31, 2019 at 05:00 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
General counsel today are looking at a more than 5% chance that their companies will be sued this year due to a drop in stock price, according to a new report.
The Securities Class Action Filings—2019 Midyear Assessment, released Thursday by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, shows that plaintiffs filed 198 new federal securities class actions in the first half of 2019. The number of filings continued this year at a near record level.
“The likelihood of a lawsuit of this type has increased substantially over the last 10 years,” said Sasha Aganin, vice president of Cornerstone Research and co-author of the report. “If you go back to 2010, the likelihood was slightly above 2%. Now it's above 5%.” And even higher for Standard & Poor's 500 firms at 6.4%.
Aganin said the increased number of filings carry a financial impact beyond the mere cost of litigation and settlements.
“I'm sure the companies are feeling the pain in terms of higher insurance premiums,” he said, “particularly in cases related to public offerings.”
Kevin LaCroix, an attorney and executive vice president of RT ProExec, an insurance intermediary that focuses on management liability issues, said, “It is definitely true that director and officer insurance pricing has been going up over the past 12 to 18 months.”
Both he and Aganin said the price increases were driven by the sheer number of suits, plus the increased number of filings in state courts following the U.S. Supreme Court's Cyan Inc. decision last year.
The data show that state courts dismiss fewer of these claims than do federal courts, making state courts more attractive for filing.
LaCroix said he would advise general counsel “to start working early on your [insurance] renewal, and to be prepared for it not to be so smooth and frictionless as it has in the past.” He predicted the life sciences and technology sectors, along with non-U.S. companies that are listed in the U.S., will likely see the most significant rate increases.
Brian Lutz, a litigation partner in the San Francisco and New York offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and co-chair the firm's national securities litigation practice, said several factors are driving the high level of filings.
“First, in a period of significant market volatility, plaintiff's lawyers are seizing on any movement in a company's stock price as an opportunity to assert a claim for securities fraud,” Lutz said. “And second, plaintiff's lawyers are continuing to file lawsuits challenging virtually every public company merger.”
Lutz said if a company's stock price declines, even modestly, for any reason, general counsel should “know that enterprising plaintiff's lawyers are paying attention and searching for any basis to assert a securities fraud lawsuit. It's important to have a response plan in place in order to not be caught off-guard by litigation.”
In other key trends, the report said:
- The life sciences industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and health care, were the hardest hit by 32 new filings, followed by 19 filings against internet and telecommunications companies.
- Of 61 recent filings, 26 appeared in state courts only, 12 in federal courts only, and 23 were parallel filings in both courts.
- The number of core—nonmerger related—filings against European firms increased to its second-highest level on record, with 13.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Ingersoll Rand Enforces a Noncompete Against an Exec Who Jumped Ship to Verboten Competitor
Litigator of the Week: After Years Repping Prenatal Testing Client, First-Time First Chair Lands a $57M Patent Damages Verdict
Litigators of the Week: Cravath and Cooley Clear a Path for Amgen's $27.8B Acquisition of Horizon Therapeutics
Trending Stories
- 1Remembering Ted Olson
- 2Support Magistrates: Statutorily Significant
- 3Nelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
- 4Immunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250