Daily Dicta: Kasowitz Seals Win for Marine Who Warned of Terror Attack—and Was Punished
2016, you might recall, was a year where using personal email to send classified government information loomed large (cough, Hillary)—but this case was over the top.
August 14, 2019 at 12:42 PM
3 minute read
In late 2016, I wrote about pro bono work by Kasowitz Benson Torres partner Michael Bowe on behalf of Major Jason Brezler, who was relieved of command “due to loss of trust and confidence” and slated to be kicked out of the Marine Corps.
The reason? He warned his comrades in Afghanistan of a possible attack, but in his haste to do so, he sent a classified document from his personal email account.
2016, you might recall, was a year where using personal email to send classified government information loomed large (cough, Hillary)—but this case was over the top.
Brezler, when he was stationed in Afghanistan in 2009, helped expel a local police chief who was allegedly “kidnapping and keeping Afghan boys as sex slaves, trafficking in narcotics, and providing arms, munitions, and Afghan police uniforms to the Taliban,” according to a complaint filed by Bowe in the Eastern District of New York.
But a few years later, the same man somehow secured a position as the chief of the Afghan police unit stationed at a Marine base in Delhi, Afghanistan.
By this time, Brezler was back in the U.S., attending graduate school in Oklahoma. One of his comrades overseas recognized the police chief and asked Brezler to forward a dossier on him. Brezler immediately sent the document—he still had it on his computer—and warned that the man was an urgent danger to the base.
The warning was ignored and soon after, a member of the man’s entourage got a hold of an unsecured rifle and killed three troops on base in August of 2012.
Suffice to say, the commanders who ignored Brezler’s warning didn’t look good in the face of congressional and journalistic inquiries about the shooting.
Brezler almost immediately realized he’d made a mistake by sending the classified document via his personal email and reported the “spillage” to his commanding officer. An initial inquiry concluded “the probability of further compromise is remote and the threat to national security is minimal.”
Nonetheless, a few months later, Brezler received an adverse “fitness report,” and a Board of Inquiry recommended that he be discharged from the Marines.
To Bowe, the actions were a case of retaliation. His client was punished for speaking to Rep. Peter King, D-New York, he alleged, and the military violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide Brezler with all documents relevant to his retaliation claims.
In December of 2016, U.S. District Judge Joseph Bianco reversed and remanded the case—though we all know that doesn’t guarantee a happy ending.
This time, it did. A panel of Marine Corps officers held that while Brezler failed to “properly discharge the duties expected of an officer of his grade and experience,” the transgression was not enough to warrant discharge.
“For seven years, Jason has fought for one reason: He loves the Marine Corps and wants to continue to contribute,” Bowe said. “This was the right result from a panel of senior Marines Corps officers, all of whom came up to him after and expressed their support.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Why Lewis Roca's Doug Tumminello Treks to Ukraine to Offer Material and Moral Support in Fight Against Russia
Litigators of the Week: In Largest MDL to Date, 3M Settles for $6B With Veterans Claiming Hearing Damage
Litigators of the Week: Willkie's $455M Win Against Iran for US Soldiers Hurt or Killed in Terrorism Attacks in Iraq
Trending Stories
- 1How Uncertainty in College Athletics Compensation Could Drive Lawsuits in 2025
- 2Insurers Dodge Sherwin-Williams' Claim for $102M Lead Paint Abatement Payment, State High Court Rules
- 3Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities Under the Second Trump Administration
- 4As Atlanta Partners Moved to Am Law 200 Firms at a Higher Rate in 2024, 2 New Arrivals Benefited
- 5A Tech-Enabled Approach to Professional Development Is the Path Forward for Young Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250