Texas Launches Public Portal to Make Civil Court Records Available Online
“We are proud of the greater transparency. We want people generally to see what’s going on in their courts. This just enhances that," said Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht.
August 21, 2019 at 06:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
It’s taken a lot longer than expected, but Texas has launched full public access to its own statewide court records system, which is similar to the federal courts’ PACER portal.
Since 2017, Texas judges, court clerks and attorneys have been able to use re:SearchTX to search for and view court documents that were e-filed in any of the state’s 254 counties. However, up until this point, lawyers were limited to viewing only cases in which they were attorneys of record.
Now, the public launch gives lawyers access to every case in the state, except for criminal cases.
Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht, who’s been using re:SearchTX for two years to check trial court records that appellate attorneys cite in their briefs, said it’s saved his clerks from the cumbersome process of calling trial court clerks to request court documents.
“This way, you push a few buttons, and there it is,” he said. “We are proud of the greater transparency. We want people generally to see what’s going on in their courts. This just enhances that. You’ve been able to do that for years with the federal courts, but Texas is such a big state, and so diverse, it’s been hard to get it done. But we are finally there.”
Registering for an account to search for court cases is free, but viewing and downloading documents cost 10 cents per page, up to a $6 maximum. That money goes to the court clerk where the document originated. The system offers a free account, and premium and pro levels for monthly fees that come with additional searching, saving, organizing and case alerting functions.
There are some limits on the documents available in re:SearchTX. Lawyers can see filings back to January 2016, and the public can see records from November 2018. Anything that a party has e-filed in any court statewide will be there. However, unless that court has chosen to fully integrate its case management system with re:SearchTX, it won’t have final orders and judgments, nor filings by unrepresented litigants who paper file directly with a court clerk.
Right now, among the state’s 254 counties, only the courts in Burnet and Collin counties are fully integrated, while courts in Denton and Fort Bend counties are in the process of integrating. El Paso and Grayson County courts are planning to integrate with re:SearchTX, but no timeline has been established.
Tyler Technologies, the same company that runs eFileTexas, the statewide e-filing system that the Supreme Court requires lawyers to use, also powers re:SearchTX. The company runs similar systems in Georgia, Illinois and New Mexico.
“Tyler and the state of Texas share ambitious goals for expanding access to justice,” said a statement by Mitchell Spence, senior vice president of eSolutions for Tyler’s Courts & Justice Division. “Re:SearchTX helps the legal community easily access the information and documents they need to be successful.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Simpson Thacher and ACLU Team To Challenge Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
A Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Even With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250