El Paso Family Moves to Sue Walmart Over Mass Shooting
"Despite the crowd at the premises on the day of the shooting, Walmart failed to provide security guards to protect the patrons at the premises," said the petition.
September 04, 2019 at 02:12 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
A family injured when a gunman opened fire in a Walmart in El Paso initiated what might be the first litigation following the mass shooting.
Jessica and Guillermo Garcia were both shot while their two children watched, and now they're alleging that Walmart was negligent by not providing proper security at the store to prevent the Aug. 3 shooting. They're seeking a court's permission to take depositions of Walmart Inc. and Walmart Stores Texas representatives to investigate potential legal claims against the retailer.
"Despite the crowd at the premises on the day of the shooting, Walmart failed to provide security guards to protect the patrons at the premises," said the petition in Garcia v. Walmart Inc.
Walmart spokesman Randy Hargrove wrote in an email that once Walmart is served with the lawsuit, it will respond with the court.
"This tragic event will be with us forever and our hearts go out to the families that were impacted. Safety is a top priority, and we care deeply about our associates and customers. We preserved what information we have, and we've worked meticulously with federal and local authorities as they documented everything that took place," Hargrove said.
In their Aug. 30 verified petition to take deposition, filed in El Paso County district court, the Garcia family alleged that Walmart failed in its duty of care to secure the store and keep people safe. By not providing a guard who would stop the shooter from coming into the store, Walmart created a hazardous condition for shoppers, the petition said.
If the court grants the pre-suit depositions, the Garcias' attorney intends to gather information about Walmart's companywide security measures. For the El Paso location, the Garcias are trying to learn what exact security measures were in place, the history of crimes occurring at the location, whether anyone has filed complaints over security at the store in the past five years, and how much Walmart budgeted for security at the store, among other things.
The Garcias are also asking the court to grant a temporary restraining order to stop Walmart from changing, altering or destroying the crime scene of the El Paso store, or other details or evidence of the shooting. Walmart has been renovating the store since it took possession back from law enforcement two weeks ago, noted the petition.
Plaintiffs attorney Rob Ammons, founding partner of The Ammons Law Firm in Houston, didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
Previously, Ammons told Texas Lawyer that mass shootings have become so common in the United States that he feels they are foreseeable in any location that attracts mass gatherings of people.
"If you are going to operate as a store, with that many people in it, you need to be doing what's reasonable to protect those people," he said.
Related story:
Read the petition:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Kirkland Litigators and Restructuring Lawyers Partner on Bankruptcy Work
Litigators of the Week: Hitting Walmart With a $100M Verdict in Its Own Backyard
Litigator of the Week: Standing Strong for Under Armour's Trademarks Without Going Overboard Against Upstart Armorina
How a Luxury Designer Made the Case 'Adidas Does Not Own Stripes'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250