Partisan Divisions Are 'Not Serving Our Country Well,' Justice Ginsburg Tells Law Students
"I think it will take courageous people on both sides who care about the health and welfare of the country and who will say, 'Enough of this dysfunction,'" Ginsburg said.
September 12, 2019 at 06:56 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Thursday told a class of first-year law students in Washington that the partisan divisions dominating government today are "not serving our country well."
Ginsburg, appearing at Georgetown University Law Center, was responding to a student's question about how she might draw on her friendship with the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia—the justice's ideological opposite on the court—as a guide to bridge divides.
Ginsburg recalled the close working relationships between Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy and Republican Sen. Strom Thurmond when they were on the Senate Judiciary Committee even though they didn't agree on many issues. "It was even better," she added, when then-Democratic Sen. Joe Biden was chairman and Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch was ranking member.
"Some day we will get back to the way it should be," Ginsburg said. "I think it will take courageous people on both sides who care about the health and welfare of the country and who will say, 'Enough of this dysfunction.'"
Ginsburg began her appearance with a summary of the Supreme Court's decisions from last term and a preview of some of the cases that the justices will hear in the new term beginning Oct. 7. "I can safely predict the new term will have a fair share of closely watched cases," she said.
The court's new term includes major disputes about the scope of workplace rights for gay, lesbian and transgender employees, and the court is set to hear a case about whether the Trump administration can end an Obama-era program that let certain children of immigrants to remain lawfully in the country.
Other Trump-administration cases are in the lower courts, including disputes over whether the president can defy congressional subpoenas seeking copies of his financial records. A dispute over the Trump administration's effort to effectively ban asylum along the southern border could also reach the court this term.
Ginsburg's remarks at Georgetown come a day after she and Justice Sonia Sotomayor signed a blistering dissent that said the Trump administration should not be allowed to enforce an asylum ban along the southern border while a lawsuit is pending in California.
Ginsburg's recounting of the Supreme Court's major decisions from last term included the ruling that stopped the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. delivered the deciding fifth vote, aligning with the court's liberal members and drawing a fresh rebuke from some conservatives.
Roberts had been prepared to vote in favor of the U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the census, but changed his vote, according to a new report from CNN. Roberts, according to the report, which cited anonymous sources, began to "waver" after oral arguments.
Ginsburg was asked various questions Thursday. Her strongest remarks came in response to a student who asked her what one thing she would add to the Constitution if possible.
"An equal rights amendment," Ginsburg replied. Sometimes, she said, she is asked why she cares about an equal rights amendment when the 14th Amendment equal protection clause serves the same purpose.
"I turn to my Constitution," she said, pulling out a copy. "I have three granddaughters. I can point to the First Amendment protecting their freedom of speech but I can't point to anything that says men and women are of equal stature before the law. I would like to say to my grandchildren that equal status of men and women is a fundamental premise of our system. I was a proponent of the equal rights amendment. I hope someday it will be put back in the political hopper and we'll be starting over again collecting the necessary states to ratify it."
Read more:
Two SCOTUS Vets Denounce Roberts's Census Ruling as 'One-Off' and 'Bizarre'
Inside Wilson Sonsini's Pro Bono SCOTUS Work for Delaware Governor
What New Supreme Court Cases Reveal About Big Law Billing Rates
Feeling 'Very Good,' Ginsburg Draws Thousands in Arkansas Appearance
Roberts, Ruling Against Trump, Faces New Round of Conservatives' Criticism
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250