Judge Pushes End-Game in Russian 'Troll Farm' Case: 'We're Now on a Trial Track.'
U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich added at a hearing in a Mueller-related prosecution: "If I left this up to you all, we wouldn't be trying this case until 2021."
September 16, 2019 at 02:52 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A federal judge on Monday pressed lawyers to prepare for an April trial in the prosecution of a Russian company charged with interfering in the 2016 presidential election, expressing frustration over delays in a case that was originally brought by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's office.
"We're now on a trial track," declared U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich of the District of Columbia, during a 90-minute court hearing in Washington's federal trial court. She added: "If I left this up to you all, we wouldn't be trying this case until 2021."
Friedrich, federal prosecutors and defense lawyers for the Russian company, Concord Management and Consulting, have argued for months over evidence in the case and who gets to see it.
Concord Management, represented by the law firm Reed Smith, was among several Russian organizations and individuals charged in February 2018 with carrying out a scheme that involved purchasing advertisements and posing as Americans on social media, all with the aim of sowing discord in the U.S. electorate.
Of the 16 defendants charged in the case, Concord Management is the only one that has answered to the accusations in Washington federal court. Concord Management has mounted an aggressive defense, with Reed Smith partner Eric Dubelier attacking Mueller's appointment as unlawful and arguing the special counsel's office charged the Russian company with a "made up crime."
On Monday, Dubelier said he plans to make another attempt to have the case against Concord dismissed. Dubelier also revealed that, after months of grousing about the challenges of sharing sensitive case materials with Concord Management, he is traveling in coming weeks to meet with his foreign client. The company is headed by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a wealthy businessman with close ties to the Kremlin who was among the Russian individuals charged by Mueller's office in February 2018.
Mueller's team handed the case off to career prosecutors in Washington earlier this year after the special counsel investigation ended. The case against Concord, along with the other Russian defendants, has centered on claims that they took steps to conceal their interference efforts from the U.S. government, namely the Federal Election Commission and U.S. Justice Department.
From the bench on Monday, Friedrich denied Dubelier's bid to extract further information from prosecutors about their case against Concord Management. "Put simply," Friedrich said, "Concord has what it needs" to prepare for trial.
The case has featured tense moments between Dubelier and Friedrich, who scolded him earlier this year over court filings in which he cited Tweety Bird and the 1978 film "Animal House."
"Knock it off," Friedrich told him, describing his court filings as "unprofessional, inappropriate, and ineffective."
On Monday, Dubelier displayed his bold style, but his relationship with Friedrich appeared to have warmed. As Dubelier argued that Concord faces an unprecedented prosecution—a "one-of-a-kind indictment in the history of our country"—Friedrich rose from her chair. Flashing a smile, she said she had a sore hip and urged Dubelier to continue speaking.
"Now you're intimidating me. Can I stand on a box?" Dubelier said. "At least it wasn't me causing you pain."
Friedrich, responding with a joke of her own, said it was "both."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
The New Federal Sentencing Factor in Downstate New York? Prison Conditions
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250