'Go Home, Sober Up, Decompress:' SDNY Judge Stays Trump Tax Subpoena Another Day
Lawyers for the president argue that the Mazars subpoena is worryingly similar to one for Trump's tax returns filed by the U.S. House of Representatives.
September 25, 2019 at 11:59 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawyers for President Donald Trump and the New York County District Attorney's Office walked out of a courtroom in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday morning after a hearing that offered little resolution to their subpoena impasse, as U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero urged them to work out their differences.
The parties went to the hearing after briefing their positions on the validity of a contested grand jury subpoena, with Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. insisting on compliance and Trump lawyers saying there is no justification for demanding his tax documents.
Subpoenas filed by the DA's office in August sought eight years of Trump's tax returns and assorted other financial information related to the president, his businesses and his associates. Trump sued his accounting firm Mazars USA, which was the recipient of the tax return subpoena, and Vance last week, arguing that the subpoena is a politically motivated attack that runs afoul of constitutional standards as it could impair the president's ability to perform his official duties.
Lawyers from the DA's office replied that they were seeking documents as part of ordinary grand jury activities that may or may not ever lead to criminal indictments.
Late Tuesday, hours before the hearing in Marrero's courtroom, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman filed his first statement in the matter. Berman said he supported a temporary restraining order that would give his office time to consider the issues and whether to get involved.
Marrero said in court Wednesday that Berman's office should make its decision by Monday and file any documents by Oct. 2. He ordered representatives for Vance and Trump to talk Wednesday and Thursday and see if some documents requested by the subpoena can be turned over without further adjudication.
"Go home, sober up, decompress and see if you can find a way to accommodate concerns of both sides," Marrero said.
It was not immediately clear what will happen if those talks break down.
Carey Dunne, general counsel to the Manhattan DA's office, told Marrero he was worried Trump's lawyers would refuse to produce anything other than the most routine correspondence. He also objected to the fact that all these proceedings are taking place in federal court and not state court.
William Consovoy of Consovoy McCarthy, who is representing the president, told Marrero that the DA's Mazars subpoena was worryingly similar to a subpoena for Trump's tax returns filed by the U.S. House of Representatives.
The House subpoena was publicly available, Assistant District Attorney Solomon Shinerock replied. He said he wanted to save Mazars employees additional labor as they responded to the subpoenas, so he submitted one that was substantially similar. He emphasized that he has had no contact with the House and the two investigations are not related.
Further stays give the president and his lawyers what they want, which is a delay until statutes of limitations have run out and the president has left office, rendering questions of immunity irrelevant, Dunne said.
Marrero asked whether the grand jury is "sitting on its hands" without the subpoenaed documents, and Dunne and Shinerock acknowledged there is some other work it could do.
The Manhattan district attorney's office has argued that the subpoenaed documents should be delivered while the questions raised by Trump's legal team are adjudicated. They would be confidential to the grand jury, they argued, so the risk of harm from release is minimal.
Consovoy questioned the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings, noting that there could be leaks or New York State could change its laws to make the documents public. He said the DA's office has also not addressed whether it would comply with a Congressional subpoena for the documents.
Dunne said the idea that grand jury proceedings in New York would suddenly become public is an "extravagant claim."
"The State of New York could be annexed by Ukraine, and that could invalidate grand jury secrecy," he said. "It's all fanciful."
Consovoy noted that state legislators have made legislative moves to get Trump's tax returns before.
This is a developing story.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250