DOJ Weighs In on Manhattan DA's Fight for Trump Tax Returns
The DOJ lawyer wrote that his office supports "interim relief as necessary to allow for appropriate briefing of the weighty constitutional issues involved."
October 02, 2019 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The U.S. Department of Justice filed documents Wednesday in an ongoing legal battle for President Donald Trump's tax returns, which were subpoenaed by New York County District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. in August.
U.S. Department of Justice special counsel Joshua Garner argued that it is "correct and important" for Trump's subpoena challenge to move forward in federal court and not state court. Vance's lawyers have repeatedly said a state subpoena should be challenged in state court.
Garner, who is assigned to the federal programs branch of the Justice Department's civil division, wrote that his office supports "interim relief as necessary to allow for appropriate briefing of the weighty constitutional issues involved." The court schedule should allow time for "considered deliberation," he wrote.
Trump's legal team has requested an injunction prohibiting Vance from enforcing the subpoena and prohibiting Trump's accounting firm, Mazars USA, from complying with it.
In a filing late Sept. 24, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman wrote to support a temporary restraining order while he and his colleagues decided whether to participate in the case, given the constitutional issues raised by the president.
After an initial hearing Sept. 25, U.S. Senior District Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York laid out the timeline for the U.S. Attorney's Office response and told lawyers for Trump and Vance to try to work out a plan on their own.
Vance's office has agreed not to enforce the subpoena until 1 p.m. Oct. 7 or 1 p.m. the day that falls two business days after Marrero rules on pending motions, whichever is sooner.
Some of the points Garner made in his filing were similar to arguments made by Trump's lawyers in their complaint. Garner wrote that the president's job is unique and its demands unceasing.
The fact that the recipient of the subpoena was Trump's accounting firm and not the president is immaterial, Garner wrote.
Garner asserted that comity between state and federal courts is a two-way street.
"A proper understanding of comity requires a federal court in these circumstances to exercise its jurisdiction rather than abstain," he wrote.
Read More:
Geoffrey Berman Letter Says US Attorney's Office Will File Papers in Trump Subpoena Challenge
'Go Home, Sober Up:' Federal Judge Stays Trump Tax Return Subpoena Another Day
Crux of Trump's Challenge to NY Tax Returns Law Must Fail if State Official Is Let Out
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250