Opening Day Highlights: A Supreme Court Argument Debut, and a New Format
Sarah Schrup, head of Northwestern University School of Law's Supreme Court practicum, was the first lawyer to make use of the new two minutes of uninterrupted argument time.
October 07, 2019 at 03:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
It was a packed house at the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday morning. Was it because this was the first Monday in October, the big day for Supreme Court aficionados? Or was it because Supreme Court practitioners wanted to see how the court's new policy giving advocates two uninterrupted minutes of argument time would work out?
Either way, the lawyers' section was full. Former deputy solicitor general Michael Dreeben, who was accustomed to sitting at the counsel table for his hundred-plus arguments, this time had to sit in the public seating because of the crowd. And outside, the lines were growing longer by the minute, with some stalwarts waiting to hear Monday's arguments and others camping out for seats Tuesday, when the justices hear landmark arguments over workplace civil rights protection for LGBTQ employees.
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. started off the session by alerting spectators that Justice Clarence Thomas was "indisposed because of illness." Then Roberts paid tribute to Justice Stephen Breyer for his "distinguished service" of 25 years on the court, and to the late Justice John Paul Stevens, who died in July. "His kindness, humility, independence and wisdom have left us a better court," Roberts said. He added: "His commitment to justice has left us a better nation."
After swearing in a passel of lawyers to the Supreme Court bar, the first oral argument began: Kahler v. Kansas, a debate over whether states can abolish the insanity defense. Sarah Schrup, head of Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law's Supreme Court practicum, rose to argue at the high court for the first time. And she was the first lawyer to make use of the two uninterrupted minutes of argument time.
Two minutes turns out to be a long time with a court whose members are accustomed to asking questions almost immediately after the lawyer says "May it please the court." It may have felt long, but it also felt civil, giving lawyers a brief and dignified chance to frame their arguments before the melee begins.
And sure enough, as soon as the white light flickered on to signal that the two minutes were up, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg jumped in forcefully with a question for Schrup. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who is often the first questioner, was silent as Schrup argued for the insanity defense against a barrage of skeptical questions from other justices.
But Sotomayor made up for her silence by being the first questioner at the end of the two-minute allotments for Kansas Solicitor General Toby Crouse and assistant to the solicitor general Elizabeth Prelogar. The questioning was brisk from all the justices on the bench, and every remaining minute was used.
The shiny two-minute gifts seemed to be a hit. After the argument was over, Schrup said, "It was fine." And Dreeben, who had been skeptical about the change, said, "it was better than I expected."
Read more:
Winston & Strawn Loses SCOTUS Bid to Stop Ex-Partner's Discrimination Lawsuit
Paul Weiss Pokes Gibson Dunn in New SCOTUS Brief in Consumer Bureau Case
Say Your Piece, Supreme Court Advocates. But Only for Two Minutes
Ex-SG Donald Verrilli Takes Lead for Sandy Hook Victims in SCOTUS Case
Record Number of Companies Back LGBT Workplace Rights in SCOTUS Brief
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: 3 Former SGs Team Up In a Major Opioid Win for Pharmacies at the Ohio Supreme Court
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Litigators of the Week: The Eighth Circuit Knocks Out a $564M Verdict Against BMO in Ponzi Case
Litigator of the Week: Reversing a $2B Trade Secret Verdict, the Largest in Va. History
Trending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250