Ex-Associates Blast Jones Day's Bid to Dodge Dad Bias Suit
Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff doubled down on their argument that the firm's parental leave policy discriminates against fathers—and that Jones Day knows it.
October 10, 2019 at 07:01 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
The married couple who is suing Jones Day for its allegedly discriminatory parental leave policies urged a federal court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday to reject the firm's 37-page motion to dismiss.
In their own 50-page filing, Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff argued that Jones Day's parental leave policies violate civil rights laws because birth mothers are offered eight weeks of paid disability leave but not fathers.
"The policy labels the extra eight weeks 'disability leave,' but the label is a sham: Jones Day gives the extra eight weeks to all mothers regardless of disability, simply because they are mothers rather than fathers. It even gives an extra eight weeks to adoptive parents, who incur no disability whatsoever," Savignac and Sheketoff wrote in their opposition to Jones Day's motion to dismiss. The couple are representing themselves in this case.
"As Jones Day's own citations—and other cases that Jones Day does not mention—confirm, that is illegal discrimination on the basis of sex," they added.
Savignac and Sheketoff sued Jones Day in August, alleging that they first complained to the firm about its parental leave policies in 2018 before their son was born. Sheketoff left Jones Day in August 2018. Savignac was fired five months later, after he sent another email seeking 18 weeks of paid leave or else he would sue and fight the issue both in court and the "court of public opinion."
The firm framed Savignac's email as a threat and grounds for termination, although the couple described Jones Day's arguments on retaliation as frivolous: "Defendants' firing of a hardworking associate with a two-week-old baby was a willful violation of those [civil rights] laws."
Neither the firm nor Savignac and Sheketoff, who are representing themselves in the case, immediately responded to requests for comment.
Jones Day is also fighting off a proposed $200 million class action that was filed by former associates who allege that the firm systemically discriminates against women lawyers. On Tuesday, the firm answered the third amended complaint filed by the plaintiffs in that case.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Litigation Leaders: Laura Hoey of Ropes & Gray on Bringing an Industry Focus to Litigation Matters
Talking Shop About Faegre Drinker's New Arizona Design Lab with Trial Partner David 'DJ' Gross
Trending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250