Feds Charge GirlsDoPorn Owner, 3 Others With Sex Trafficking
Eight weeks into a civil trial brought by 22 former models, the San Diego U.S. attorney is accusing Michael Pratt and others of a scheme to "deceive and coerce young women to appear in sex videos."
October 11, 2019 at 12:11 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The San Diego U.S. attorney's office is bringing criminal sex trafficking charges against the owner of GirlsDoPorn.com and three others associated with the website.
Owner Michael James Pratt; videographer and consultant Matthew Isaac Wolfe; actor and model recruiter Ruben Andre Garcia and former administrative assistant Valorie Moser are accused of participating in a scheme to deceive and coerce young women to appear in sex videos, according to a press release issued by the office.
The criminal complaint, which is expected to be unsealed Friday, appears to track civil allegations by 22 women against three of the defendants and related business entities. The defendants allegedly convinced the women they could perform anonymously and their videos would not be posted on the internet. "In reality, the entire purpose was to post the videos on the internet," according the U.S. attorney's office.
Attorneys who represent Pratt and Wolfe at the civil trial did not immediately respond to a request for comment. They have argued at trial that they were upfront about the nature of the videos, and that the women signed contracts giving them the right to distribute the videos throughout the world without limitations.
Wolfe was taken into custody Tuesday, the day after completing several days of testimony in the civil trial in San Diego Superior Court. Garcia was arrested on Wednesday. Moser, who testified two weeks ago, is scheduled to be arraigned Friday.
Garcia and Pratt have declined to appear at the trial, though Pratt's attorneys have been negotiating for him to appear via video feed. Wolfe testified that Pratt told him in a recent phone conversation that he'd spent time in Mexico and then returned to his native New Zealand in the run-up to the trial. The U.S. attorney's office has deemed Pratt a fugitive.
The U.S. attorney's office contends that the defendants used deception and false promises to lure the victims, who had responded to ads for modeling jobs. Once the women responded, the defendants would disclose that the job was really for adult films, but assure them that they could remain anonymous, according to the office. Ultimately the videos appeared both on GirlsDoPorn.com and other popular porn websites, resulting in harassment and ridicule. The complaint also charges that some models were sexually assaulted and in at least one case raped, according to the office.
Pratt, Garcia and Wolfe are charged under 18 U.S.C. Section 1591(a) and (b)(1), which outlaw sex trafficking by force, fraud and coercion. Moser is charged with conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. Section 1594.
Wolfe, who filmed some of the videos, testified last week that none of the models asked him about distribution and that he never made any promises about it either. He also acknowledged that the company did not then, nor does it now, specify in its model releases that the videos will appear online or at GirlsDoPorn.com.
Moser testified that she had heard Pratt promise some models on the phone that distribution would be limited to DVD, and that he instructed her not to discuss distribution with the models.
Anthony Colombo, an attorney who represents Moser, said she intends to plead not guilty, and that she "looks forward to addressing the charges, whatever they might be, at a later date."
Ed Chapin, an attorney at Sanford Heisler Sharp who represents the plaintiffs, said in a written statement that he's uncertain how the charges will affect the civil trial. Superior Court Judge Kevin Enright could put the trial, now in its eighth week, on hold. "We are currently about two weeks away from finishing and would like to have our case resolved without delay," he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250