Daily Dicta: When Baseball Playoffs and Court Deadlines Collide, Nats Edition
"The nine-year old and counsel wish to continue to stay up late watching baseball and to attend tomorrow's game, if it is necessary. Counsel's attendance at each is required for supervision," wrote a Virginia lawyer in seeking a two-day extension to file a summary judgment motion.
October 16, 2019 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
We all know litigating a case is a Very Important and Serious Business.
But sometimes, what matters more is sharing the starry-eyed dream of your 9-year-old son. And baseball.
My friend and former colleague Zoe Tillman, now a reporter at BuzzFeed, flagged an extraordinary motion by William "Jay" Friedman, an Alexandria, Virginia-based lawyer who represents the Organic Trade Association in an Administration Procedure Act suit against the Department of Agriculture.
On Tuesday, Friedman asked U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer of the District of Columbia for a two-day extension to file his motion for summary judgment.
Because baseball.
But I'll stand aside. This is the motion.
CONSENT MOTION TO RESET DEADLINES BY TWO DAYS
Plaintiff respectfully submits the following unopposed request to reset the present briefing deadlines by two days.
As grounds counsel states:
- Washington D.C.'s professional baseball team, the Nationals ("Nats"), began this baseball season by losing 31 of its first 50 games.
- Since that time, due in part to the unflagging support of a certain nine-year old boy closely associated with undersigned counsel, the wheels of justice have turned and the team has rightfully advanced deep in the baseball playoffs.
- The nine-year old and counsel wish to continue to stay up late watching baseball and to attend tomorrow's game, if it is necessary. Counsel's attendance at each is required for supervision.
- A respectful request is submitted to reset the Plaintiff's date for filing summary judgment from October 18, 2019 to October 21, 2019 and to reset Defendants' Answer and CrossMotion from November 22, 2019 to November 25, 2019.
No other date needs resetting.
- With the consent of the parents and baseball fans at the Department of Justice, this request is unopposed.
Respectfully Submitted: /s/ William J. Friedman
I'm sure some of you humbugs will say he shouldn't made the request, because deadlines are sacrosanct and professional obligations should come first. But in the scheme of things, what matters more—filing the motion (with permission) two days late, or sharing a once-in-a-lifetime memory with your child?
I speak from experience. They don't stay 9 years old nearly long enough.
In an email, Friedman said he "was not apprehensive about [making] the request. Honestly, I try not to litigate like its World War III all the time and I have a good rapport with my DOJ counterpart."
He continued, "Judge Collyer has always been respectful and prompt when we reach agreement on procedural matters. I figured this might be the only chance I get to do this with my son and our system is not so frail or rigid that such requests are out of bounds. That said, when I was a younger lawyer I probably would not have thought I could ask."
In a minute order, Collyer approved the request. Which meant Friedman and his son were free to cheer on the Nats last night during game 4 against the Cardinals.
Let's hope he doesn't have anything due next week when the World Series kicks off. (Go Nats!)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250