Senior DOJ Lawyer (and Ex-Kirkland Partner) Donald Kempf Resigned Amid Misconduct Probe, Sources Confirm
A U.S. Justice Department inspector general investigation substantiated claims that the then-deputy assistant attorney general viewed sexually explicit images on government computers and that he made false statements to investigators. Kempf did not return messages seeking comment.
October 16, 2019 at 06:16 PM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Donald Kempf Jr., a former senior lawyer in the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust division, stepped down last year during an internal investigation that would conclude he viewed sexually explicit images on government computers and made false statements when he was questioned about the conduct, according to sources familiar with the probe.
The findings were outlined in a one-page summary of the investigation by the Justice Department's inspector general, which did not identify Kempf but specified that the official had served as a deputy assistant attorney general.
Kempf, a former 35-year partner at the law firm Kirkland & Ellis who was later chief legal officer at Morgan Stanley, joined the Justice Department in June 2017 and oversaw antitrust litigation. He left the Justice Department in August 2018. Sources speaking anonymously in order to discuss internal personnel matters confirmed Kempf's identity as the lawyer referenced in the investigative summary.
Kempf did not respond to voice messages The National Law Journal left at his office and on his personal phone. Additionally, Kempf, now chief executive of a wealth management company in Florida, did not respond to emails that the NLJ sent to his corporate account and to an address linked to his New York bar attorney registration. Messages sent over more than a week asked Kempf to discuss why he decided to leave the Justice Department and whether he disputed the inspector general's investigative summary.
The summary report, published Aug. 29, said the deputy assistant attorney general resigned before the investigation concluded. Kempf left the Justice Department last year at a time when he was "dealing with some difficult family health issues that have taken a turn for the worse recently," a Justice Department statement said then, according to a report at the publication MLex. The DOJ statement said Kempf, returning to his home, "could address these matters more actively and effectively."
A spokesperson for the Justice Department's inspector general declined to comment about the Kempf investigation.
In a statement to the NLJ, a Justice Department spokesperson said the department "expects all employees to hold themselves to the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct."
"The department takes allegations of employee misconduct seriously, including claims that employees lacked candor when dealing with investigators," the spokesperson said. "Whenever misconduct allegations are made, the department takes appropriate action to investigate them and to ensure appropriate accountability, which may include a range of disciplinary actions, other career consequences, or criminal prosecution, if warranted."
Reported instances of federal employees or others accessing sexually explicit content on government computers are not uncommon. A 2018 investigation published by Roll Call identified dozens of examples where federal computer networks had been used to access pornography. Justice Department information technology rules "expressly prohibit transmitting, receiving, storing or viewing sexually explicit material," according to the DOJ inspector general's office.
In the weeks since the summary report was released, the identity of the former Justice Department official had been a source of speculation within the legal community in Washington. The publication of the investigative summary attracted widespread news media coverage.
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the Republican chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, asked the Justice Department to provide him with a full report on the inspector general's investigation.
In the summary report, the inspector general's office said it "initiated an investigation upon receipt of information from the employing DOJ division alleging that a then deputy assistant attorney general (DAAG) had been observed viewing sexually explicit images" on the deputy assistant attorney general's government computers, in violation of Justice Department policy.
"An OIG forensic examination of two DOJ computers issued to the DAAG determined that the computers contained data regarding numerous sexually explicit website searches, visits to websites hosting sexually explicit videos, sexually explicit search engine terms, and sexually explicit images," according to the investigative summary, which was posted online, with other unrelated investigative reports, on the inspector general's website.
The summary said that the inspector general conducted an initial interview with the deputy assistant attorney general and that "the DAAG denied accessing or viewing sexually explicit websites or material from a government computer." The report continued: "In a follow-up interview, after being confronted with the preliminary results of the OIG forensic examination, the DAAG ultimately admitted to the OIG that the DAAG may have intentionally accessed pornographic websites using government computers."
A source familiar with the investigation said the forensic examination of Kempf's computers showed that, through the first half of 2018, hundreds of sexually explicit images had been accessed on websites with explicit photographs and videos.
The inspector general's office, according to the investigative summary, notified the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, about its findings. The professional responsibility office reviews inspector general reports "to determine whether bar disciplinary authorities should be notified of any misconduct findings against department attorneys."
The Justice Department did not comment on whether it had informed any state bar officials about the misconduct findings involving Kempf. The investigative summary said the Justice Department declined to bring a criminal prosecution.
Kempf has been a member of the New York bar since 1986, but his status is identified as "delinquent." That designation does not prohibit him from practicing as a lawyer, but it "does subject him to potential suspension from the practice of law," a New York attorney discipline office said.
In May, the Florida-based wealth management firm Cypress Trust Co. said its board of directors had appointed Kempf as president and chief executive. Kempf had been a member of the firm's board from 2011 to 2017, according to a financial disclosure he filed when he joined the Justice Department.
Cypress Trust's news release said Kempf is a "private practitioner, an AAA-and CPR-certified arbitrator and mediator and an adjunct professor of law." The release noted Kempf served in the Justice Department from 2017 to 2018 as a deputy assistant attorney general.
'Legend in Litigation' Lands at Main Justice
An octogenarian, Harvard Law School graduate and former U.S. Marine, Kempf hadn't regularly practiced law for many years before he joined the Justice Department in June 2017.
From 2006 to 2017, Kempf served as a neutral arbitrator in New York for the American Arbitration Association, according to his financial disclosure, a filing that many high-level executive branch employees are required to file. Kempf has taught at the University of South Carolina School of Law and at the University of Colorado Law School.
He told ProPublica that he came out of retirement to join the Justice Department because "my country has been very good to me" and that he "welcomed the responsibility."
Kempf joined an antitrust division led by Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, a former Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck partner who had served as deputy White House counsel in the early months of the Trump administration.
Delrahim, in a speech in 2017, called Kempf a "legend in litigation"—a description that has often appeared in news reports about him—and noted that they had both served more than a decade earlier on the Antitrust Modernization Commission, a 12-member panel formed under the George W. Bush administration to recommend updates to competition law. In another speech, Delrahim thanked Kempf "and all our service members for their service."
Shortly after arriving at the Justice Department, Kempf spoke at an American Bar Association event in Washington about "increasing the speed and reducing the burden of merger reviews." Kempf had been "heavily involved in the division's merger litigation," according to an Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer antitrust newsletter that briefly noted his retirement.
As the deputy assistant attorney general for litigation, Kempf was among the antitrust division leaders involved in the Justice Department's failed bid to block AT&T Inc.'s takeover of Time Warner, a multibillion-dollar deal that was contested on the grounds it would suppress competition and drive up prices in the pay-TV industry. A federal judge in Washington last year allowed the deal to proceed.
Kempf brought a reputation as a proven antitrust litigator whose legal career at Kirkland & Ellis was studded with court victories. In 1997, Kempf was quoted as saying he "had a dramatic influence on the course of history in the antitrust field," according to a July 2017 profile at MLex. The profile called Kempf a "go-to lawyer for merger litigation" for many years.
In the 1980s, Kempf successfully defended Great Lakes Chemical Corp. and Weyerhaeuser Co. against antitrust challenges from the Federal Trade Commission. He prevailed a decade earlier against the Justice Department when he defended General Dynamics Corp.'s acquisition of United Electric Coal Cos.
But there were setbacks. In 1997, Kempf was on the team representing Office Depot as it sought approval from the FTC for a proposed merger with Staples. The FTC went on to prevail against Staples and Office Depot in court.
Kempf had served on the Kirkland & Ellis management committee from 1981 to 1998, and the firm at one time had named a conference room after him, according to an American Lawyer report. Kempf said on his law firm website, which highlights the scope of his legal career, that he was "lead trial and appellate counsel in many of the firm's most significant cases."
In 1999, Kempf ended his long career at Kirkland & Ellis to become the chief legal officer at Morgan Stanley, a position he held until his retirement in 2005. Upon his departure from the investment bank, he was lauded for his "strong leadership and distinguished service to the firm." The Minority Corporate Counsel Association, of which Kempf had been a board member, in 2005 praised him for his "commitment to advancing diversity."
Kempf has received $17,500 in monthly retirement income from Kirkland & Ellis, according to his financial disclosure, and $1,500 monthly from Morgan Stanley.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 2'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 3Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 4Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
- 5Davis Wright Tremaine Turns to Gen AI To Teach Its Associates Legal Writing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250