Does Having Lots of Twitter Followers Mean You're a Good Lawyer?
The practicing lawyers with the biggest Twitter followings tend to be high-level government veterans
October 22, 2019 at 08:18 PM
3 minute read
The Federal Trade Commission's suit against a company that sold fake Twitter followers to clients including (unnamed) law firm partners got me wondering: Which lawyers have the biggest following on Twitter? And is there any obvious correlation to their desirability as counsel?
As a starting point, I looked at the 2019 finalists for The American Lawyer's Litigator of the Year. (Grand prize winner to be announced on December 4!)
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Ted Boutrous has an impressive 21,700 followers. But what about the others?
Roberta Kaplan of Kaplan Hecker & Fink has 7,790 followers—solid.
Shay Dvoretzky of Jones Day has 188 followers and Sharon Nelles of Sullivan & Cromwell has 159, but I don't think either of them are really trying. (Dvoretzky has posted three tweets since 2014.)
Cravath's Evan Chesler? As far as I can tell, he's not on Twitter—and somehow, I don't see him going for a secret "Pierre Delecto" account a la Mitt Romney (even though I think the two of them look like long-lost brothers #amirite?).
I also didn't find David Lender of Weil, Gotshal & Manges; Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner or Rob Saunders of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom on Twitter.
My no-duh takeaway: There's no obvious relationship between excellence in lawyering and number of Twitter followers.
The practicing lawyers with the biggest Twitter followings tend to be high-level government veterans. For example, King & Spalding's Sally Yates has 816,600 followers; Covington & Burling's Eric Holder has 509,600 and Hogan Lovells' Neal Katyal has 323,700.
Wachtell's George Conway has 718,400 followers. While he's not a former government lawyer, he's certainly got interesting ties to the current administration. Also, I wonder how he has time to practice law these days, given his volume of tweets.
Then there's Michael Avenatti with 768,500 followers and Rudy Giuliani with 503,400. You can debate among yourselves whether they count as practicing lawyers—but hey, they still beat Judge Judy, who has 117,600 followers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250