Rex Tillerson Expected to Testify as Trial Begins in NY AG's Lawsuit Against Exxon
The attorney general's office has argued that the cost models were inconsistently and confusingly applied, which led investors to pay more than they should have paid for Exxon securities.
October 22, 2019 at 05:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Theodore Wells, of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. Courtesy photo
Former Exxon Mobil CEO, chairman and onetime U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is expected to testify during a three-week trial in Manhattan Supreme Court, Exxon lawyer Theodore Wells said during his opening statement Tuesday afternoon.
Tillerson will be a "live witness," said Wells, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.
Former New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood sued Exxon in October 2018, saying the company deceived its investors about the effects of climate change on its business and value.
The former CEO's statements were highlighted by the New York attorney general's office during opening arguments.
Wells defended Exxon's practices during opening arguments and accused the attorney general's office of pursuing a political fight on behalf of climate activists.
Wells showed Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barry Ostrager an agenda from a 2015 meeting at the Rockefeller Family Fund, where he said climate activists mapped out how to fight Exxon. A line on the agenda suggested that they discussed how to get attorney generals involved, Wells said. Exxon's lawyers have said that then-New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman was successfully targeted by the activists.
Exxon had two different kinds of cost assumptions related to climate change, Wells said. One dealt with direct costs such as emissions taxes and the other was related to a projected decline in demand for oil and gas as global regulations increased, according to Wells. Employees were told to apply cost assumptions "where appropriate," Wells said.
The attorney general's office has argued that the cost models were inconsistently and confusingly applied, which led investors to pay more than they should have paid for Exxon securities.
Wells dismissed the idea that Exxon would not want the most accurate models for its own business.
"Why the heck would you want to lowball yourself?" he said in court. "You would be cheating yourself … you want to use the most accurate cost assumptions."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
Trending Stories
- 1Veritext Legal Solutions Announces the Past Acquisitions of Three Alternative Dispute Resolution Firms
- 2Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 3LSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
- 4An Eye on ‘De-Risking’: Chewing on Hot Topics in Litigation Funding With Jeffery Lula of GLS Capital
- 5Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
