NY Lawyer Lands KO for Boxer Client
Boxing may be one of the most violent sports, but when two champions have a dispute, they settle it like everyone else: With lawyers in court.
October 31, 2019 at 12:31 PM
4 minute read
Boxing may be one of the most violent sports, but when two champions have a dispute, they settle it like everyone else: With lawyers in court.
More specifically, the World Boxing Organization Complaint and Grievance Committee, where a panel of three arbitrators just issued a rare appellate decision, ordering a new fight between Krzysztof Glowacki and Mairis Briedis.
The decision is a win for Glowacki, a Polish fighter who was represented by Scott Shaffer, a New York-based partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky who has carved out a niche practice representing boxers.
A former sportswriter and officer of the Boxing Writers Association of America, Shaffer argued that his client got a raw deal when he faced off against Briedis on June 15, 2019 in Latvia.
CBS Sports called it "one of the strangest fights of the year." Glowacki and Latvian-born Briedis were facing off in the semi-finals of the World Boxing Super Series. The tournament is a big deal—it aims to bring together the best boxers in the world, with a total prize fund of $50 million.
Głowacki entered the bout as a defending champion. In the second round, Briedis "committed an intentional foul…by hitting Głowacki with an elbow to his face that knocked Głowacki to the canvas," the arbitrators held. But the referee (who is an American) only deducted one point.
When the bell rang at the end of the round, the ref apparently didn't hear it and let the pair keep fighting. At that point, Briedis landed a right hand to Głowacki's face, causing another knockdown.
In the third round, Briedis knocked Glowacki down again. He managed to get back on his feet, but the ref stopped the fight, declaring a technical knockout for Briedis.
In a post-fight interview, Briedis admitted he heard the bell in round two. As for the elbow, he said it was intentional but said Glowacki illegally punched the back of his head first.
After the match, Głowacki protested to the Latvian Professional Boxing Federation, which declined to get involved.
Shaffer took the fight to the World Boxing Organization, which after holding oral arguments issued a 2-1 decision ordering an immediate rematch.
"[I]t is the WBO's aspiration that its champions earn the greatest esteem in professional boxing by their individual capabilities as athletes and by practicing 'the highest ideals and spirit of sportsmanship,'" the arbitrators held. "This committee has no doubt that Briedis violated the WBO regulations and the fundamental principles of the organization."
Shaffer called the ruling "a big win" for Glowacki.
"A split decision win, but a big win nonetheless," he said. "He's 33 years old and does not have years to wait around for another championship opportunity. This ruling means his next fight will be for a world championship. Briedis and his promoter must now decide whether to give Glowacki an immediate rematch or else move forward in the World Boxing Super Series without the WBO championship. I know Glowacki wants the rematch because he wants to settle the score with Briedis in the ring."
Briedis was represented by Martins Kveps, LL.M. of Riga, Latvia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250