NY Lawyer Lands KO for Boxer Client
Boxing may be one of the most violent sports, but when two champions have a dispute, they settle it like everyone else: With lawyers in court.
October 31, 2019 at 12:31 PM
4 minute read
Boxing may be one of the most violent sports, but when two champions have a dispute, they settle it like everyone else: With lawyers in court.
More specifically, the World Boxing Organization Complaint and Grievance Committee, where a panel of three arbitrators just issued a rare appellate decision, ordering a new fight between Krzysztof Glowacki and Mairis Briedis.
The decision is a win for Glowacki, a Polish fighter who was represented by Scott Shaffer, a New York-based partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky who has carved out a niche practice representing boxers.
A former sportswriter and officer of the Boxing Writers Association of America, Shaffer argued that his client got a raw deal when he faced off against Briedis on June 15, 2019 in Latvia.
CBS Sports called it "one of the strangest fights of the year." Glowacki and Latvian-born Briedis were facing off in the semi-finals of the World Boxing Super Series. The tournament is a big deal—it aims to bring together the best boxers in the world, with a total prize fund of $50 million.
Głowacki entered the bout as a defending champion. In the second round, Briedis "committed an intentional foul…by hitting Głowacki with an elbow to his face that knocked Głowacki to the canvas," the arbitrators held. But the referee (who is an American) only deducted one point.
When the bell rang at the end of the round, the ref apparently didn't hear it and let the pair keep fighting. At that point, Briedis landed a right hand to Głowacki's face, causing another knockdown.
In the third round, Briedis knocked Glowacki down again. He managed to get back on his feet, but the ref stopped the fight, declaring a technical knockout for Briedis.
In a post-fight interview, Briedis admitted he heard the bell in round two. As for the elbow, he said it was intentional but said Glowacki illegally punched the back of his head first.
After the match, Głowacki protested to the Latvian Professional Boxing Federation, which declined to get involved.
Shaffer took the fight to the World Boxing Organization, which after holding oral arguments issued a 2-1 decision ordering an immediate rematch.
"[I]t is the WBO's aspiration that its champions earn the greatest esteem in professional boxing by their individual capabilities as athletes and by practicing 'the highest ideals and spirit of sportsmanship,'" the arbitrators held. "This committee has no doubt that Briedis violated the WBO regulations and the fundamental principles of the organization."
Shaffer called the ruling "a big win" for Glowacki.
"A split decision win, but a big win nonetheless," he said. "He's 33 years old and does not have years to wait around for another championship opportunity. This ruling means his next fight will be for a world championship. Briedis and his promoter must now decide whether to give Glowacki an immediate rematch or else move forward in the World Boxing Super Series without the WBO championship. I know Glowacki wants the rematch because he wants to settle the score with Briedis in the ring."
Briedis was represented by Martins Kveps, LL.M. of Riga, Latvia.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the (Past) Week: Tackling a $4.7 Billion Verdict Post-Trial for the NFL in 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Litigation
Take-Two's Pete Welch on 'Getting the Best Results While Getting in the Way the Least'
Litigators of the Week: Kirkland Beats Videogame Copyright Claim From Lebron James' Tattoo Artist
Trending Stories
- 1Considerations for Establishing or Denying a Texas Partnership to Invest in Real Estate
- 2In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures
- 3Texas Asks Trump DOJ to Reject Housing Enforcement
- 4Ideas We Should Borrow: A Legislative Wishlist for NJ Trusts and Estates
- 5Canadian Private Equity Firms Are Eyeing Tech Sector
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250