Third Accuser Files Claim About Former DLA Piper Partner
Andrea Ivan, 65, alleges that Louis Lehot pushed to have her fired in favor of a replacement who was described as "young and hot."
November 07, 2019 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A third woman who worked in DLA Piper's Silicon Valley office has come forward with accusations of improper conduct by the firm and Louis Lehot, the influential Silicon Valley rainmaker who recently left the firm amid sexual assault allegations brought by a junior partner.
Administrative assistant Andrea Ivan, who is 65, says she believes Lehot pushed a human resources officer in the firm to terminate her because of her age and that she was replaced by a woman who, according to a co-worker, was "young and hot." Her filing with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission follows an earlier complaint by an unnamed HR officer going by Jane Smith who said that she was let go because of her unwillingness to push out an administrative assistant Lehot wanted fired.
"I was unlawfully targeted by Louis Lehot, a senior partner that worked from the Palo Alto office, who decided that I was too old or not attractive enough for his tastes or both, and wanted me gone," Ivan said in her charge. "Although I suspected that Lehot bullied women in HR to terminate me, until I read Ms. Smith's account of her experiences, I had no idea that Lehot would fire a senior HR manager because she spoke out on my behalf."
Ivan is being represented by Wigdor LLP attorney Jeanne Christensen, who is already representing DLA Piper partner Vanina Guerrero as well as Smith. Guerrero kicked off the increasingly messy fight when she accused Lehot of sexually assaulting her multiple times. Guerrero has since been placed on administrative leave by the firm, which said that an internal investigation revealed that she herself had engaged in harassment.
Lehot has strongly denied Guerrero's claims of assault.
Christensen, who paired Guerrero's initial EEOC charge with a public letter asking DLA Piper to release her client from a mandatory arbitration clause, has renewed her request for the agency to investigate claims against the firm on a classwide basis.
"A work atmosphere that depicts a 'general fear by women employees at the office' is unlawful and unacceptable," she wrote to the agency.
Apart from Guerrero's claims of assault, Christensen cited Smith's alleged terror of leaving her car to enter DLA Piper's Palo Alto, California, office when Lehot was there, Ivan's allegations that she failed to meet Lehot's purported "young and hot" standards and was too scared to talk to anyone about Lehot, and a third letter from San Diego-based professional responsibility counsel Leah Christensen who claimed Lehot called her a "dumb bitch."
"Standing alone, the allegations by these women are serious. Collectively, it is implausible that DLA Piper elected Lehot to such a coveted senior position without knowledge of his discriminatory treatment towards female employees," she said.
A spokesman for Lehot reponded that "this letter is riddled with lies, just like the previous letters.''
A lawyer for DLA Piper said the firm's rejected Ivan's allegations. "DLA Piper disagrees with Ms. Ivan's charge, and will respond in due course through the EEOC process," said Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's Katherine Smith.
|Read More:
DLA Piper Says Partner 'Orchestrated' Relationship With Her Alleged Assaulter
'This Is The Future': DLA Piper's #MeToo Allegations Unleash a 3-Way Mudfight
Ex-DLA Piper Ethics Counsel Alleges Firm Tolerated 'Abuse of Power' by Ousted Partner
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250