Menashi's Confirmation Flips Second Circuit to GOP-Appointed Majority
The Senate confirmed Menashi 51 to 41, largely along party lines.
November 14, 2019 at 02:29 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The Senate on Thursday confirmed Steven Menashi to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, bringing an end to a confirmation battle that at times drew ire from members of both parties toward the judicial nominee.
The Senate confirmed Menashi 51 to 41, largely along party lines. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, broke with her party to vote against the nominee. Menashi's confirmation flips the Second Circuit to a majority of Republican appointees.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, speaking on the Senate floor ahead of Menashi's vote, said the nominee had advanced from the Senate Judiciary Committee "on the basis of strong academic and legal qualifications," including "experience in both teaching and practicing law
"I would urge all of our colleagues to vote to confirm this impressive nominee this afternoon," McConnell said.
However, Democrats have been highly critical of Menashi, citing his past writings and actions as counsel at both the U.S. Education Department and the White House. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, urged other senators to vote against the nomination in a statement Wednesday.
"Mr. Menashi should not be rewarded for providing such bad legal advice with a lifetime appointment to the federal bench," Feinstein said.
The Senate Judiciary Committee narrowly advanced his nomination along party lines last week.
Menashi faced criticism over his writings going as far back as college, including a 2010 law review piece critical of "ethnically heterogeneous societies."
And one day before he was voted out of committee, The New York Times reported that Menashi wrote a legal memo while he was acting general counsel for the Department of Education that laid out how Social Security data could be used to block students from obtaining debt relief. A federal judge struck down the plan.
Menashi also drew bipartisan frustrations during his nomination hearing with the Senate Judiciary Committee in September. A current attorney in the White House counsel's office, Menashi repeatedly declined to reveal even the topics that he offered legal advice on for the White House, citing executive privilege.
After prodding by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, Menashi did acknowledge that he sometimes gave advice on topics like immigration. But the lack of candor during the questioning raised eyebrows from those on both sides of the aisle, including GOP Sen. John Kennedy. Kennedy ultimately voted to advance Menashi out of committee.
Democrats also raised concerns about whether Menashi was involved in an alleged cover-up by White House lawyers of Trump's July call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The call is at the heart of the House's impeachment inquiry, as Trump asked Zelensky to investigate his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden and Biden's son, Hunter.
Collins, who voted against the nominee, had said in October that she wouldn't support Menashi. She said his "past writings, particularly about women, LGBTQ advocates and diversity, raise questions about whether he has the appropriate judicial temperament."
Trump announced in August that Menashi would be his nominee for a seat on the Second Circuit. A former Kirkland & Ellis partner, Menashi previously clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Read more:
Menashi Advances Closer to 2nd Circuit Despite Bipartisan Rebuke Over Obstinance
Former Alito Clerk Steven Menashi Gets Trump Nod for 2nd Circuit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 2Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 3The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 4Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 5As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250