Skadden Team Helps Win Execution Stay for Rodney Reed
Texas inmate Rodney Reed, who had been scheduled to die on Nov. 20, was convicted of the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites.
November 18, 2019 at 12:35 PM
2 minute read
A team from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom working pro bono with the Innocence Project secured a stay of execution on Friday for Texas inmate Rodney Reed, who had been scheduled to die on Nov. 20.
Reed was convicted of the 1996 murder of Stacey Stites, but has long maintained his innocence. Celebrities including Kim Kardashian West and Rihanna have championed his cause, as have politicians such as Republican Congressman Michael McCaul of Texas.
Stites was raped, strangled and left dead on the side of a road. Reed's DNA was found in a small amount of sperm inside Stites' body. Reed said they were in a consensual relationship—which multiple witnesses confirmed—but the DNA evidence was enough for an all-white jury to convict him.
The murder weapon—Stites' belt—has never been tested for DNA evidence, despite multiple requests from the defense.
Stites' fiancé, police officer Jimmy Fennell, was the original suspect in the case. After the murder, he was subsequently convicted of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a woman while on duty and sentenced to 10 years in prison. A fellow inmate said Fennell confessed to killing Stites because she was cheating on him with a black man.
For the past seven years, the Skadden team—partner Cliff Gardner, counsels Robert Weber and Sarah Runnells Martin, associates Michelle Davis, Nicole DiSalvo, Shaivlini Khemka, Juliana van Hoeven and Gregory Ranzini, and law clerk Steven Becton—have worked with the Innocence Project on the case.
"We are thrilled that the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles unanimously recommended to Governor Abbott a 120-day reprieve from Mr. Reed's November 20th execution date and that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has granted him a stay of execution and remanded his case back to the trial court for further evidentiary proceedings on his actual innocence and other claims," Gardner said.
"We are grateful for these decisions which allow for the proper review and consideration of the new and comprehensive evidence of Mr. Reed's innocence," he continued. "And we have been inspired by the tremendous outpouring of bipartisan support for Mr. Reed over the past several weeks. We look forward to continuing to advocate for Mr. Reed and ensuring his constitutional rights are upheld."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250