SCOTUS Takes a Pass on 'Pharma Bro' Martin Shkreli's Appeal
Martin Shkreli, convicted of securities fraud, was CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, when sudden increases in the price of lifesaving drugs attracted media coverage and questions from Congress.
November 18, 2019 at 02:20 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The U.S. Supreme Court will not hear an appeal from disgraced pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, according to an order released by the justices Monday.
Shkreli's 2017 conviction on securities fraud and conspiracy charges was upheld in a summary order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in July.
In 2018, a judge in the Eastern District of New York sentenced Shkreli to seven years in prison and ordered him to pay fines and restitution and to forfeit more than $7.3 million, which prosecutors said he'd acquired through a Ponzi-like scheme in his two hedge funds.
He is currently imprisoned in central Pennsylvania, according to federal prison records.
His petition for certiorari centered on the district judge's jury instruction about whether Shkreli believed "no ultimate harm" would come from his actions. Shkreli's lawyers asked the court to consider whether that instruction was appropriate for a securities fraud case and to reevaluate whether Shkreli's forfeiture amount was calculated correctly.
The Second Circuit rejected similar arguments on his appeal there.
Shkreli gained notoriety as the "pharma bro" when he was CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, where sudden increases in the price of lifesaving drugs attracted media coverage and questions from Congress. He also bought the single extant copy of a Wu-Tang Clan album, an unreleased Lil Wayne album and a Pablo Picasso painting.
Notoriety is "never helpful," Shkreli's lawyer Benjamin Brafman of Brafman & Associates wrote in a statement about the Supreme Court's decision Monday.
"We are disappointed by the court's decision and continue to maintain that Martin was never treated fairly by any of the courts that have reviewed his case," Brafman wrote. "Unfortunately there is often a price to pay for notoriety. It is never helpful."
A spokesman in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York declined to comment.
Read more:
Shkreli Settles Disputes With His Former Company, Firm Says
Shkreli Gets Seven-Year Prison Sentence for Stock Fraud Conviction
Jury Finds Former Martin Shkreli Attorney Guilty in Stock Scheme
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1BOI Reports: What Business Owners and Attorneys Should Know
- 2SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 3Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 4The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 5Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250