Litigation Funders Find Traction With Smaller Firms
While the supply of capital may be outstripping demand for now, a litigation finance broker thinks growing awareness will lead to greater adoption.
November 20, 2019 at 05:17 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Small law firms have mostly been the ones driving the boom in commercial litigation finance, according to a new report on the industry from broker Westfleet Advisors.
In collecting data on several dozen commercial litigation funders active in the U.S. market, Westfleet found that 70% of the capital committed by litigation funders over a 12-month period spanning 2018 and 2019 went to firms outside of the Am Law 200.
In a connected finding, the broker also highlighted the popularity of portfolio deals that fund a collection of cases being handled by a particular law firm; 47% of capital committed over the study period took the form of law firm portfolios. These are predominantly employed by firms who have or are looking to build contingency-fee practices.
"It's a function of the fact that smaller law firms are more willing to entertain contingency fee arrangements than larger law firms," said Westfleet managing partner Charles Agee III.
Westfleet attempted to collect data from the 41 commercial litigation funders it identified as being currently active in the U.S. market. The vast majority contributed information via a third party which was then kept confidential as it was aggregated. The buyers guide also includes capsule summaries of over 30 funders.
Based on these efforts, the broker found that the industry had a total of $9.5 billion in assets under management dedicated to commercial litigation finance. Of that total, in the past year $2.3 billion was committed to commercial litigation finance transactions with a nexus to the U.S.
For Westfleet, that disparity suggests that the supply of capital available is outpacing the current rate of deployment, and it indicates that funders feel pressure to increase their pace of deployment.
That, in turn, indicates a buyers market for the users of commercial litigation finance, both law firms and entities that have viable claims they'd be eager to pursue if attorneys fees were not an issue.
"I think funders are going to be reluctant to compete on price so you'll see them competing on process. That will make for a better overall user experience and will be better for the overall industry," Agee said.
But Agee doesn't anticipate the buyers market to continue indefinitely, particularly as players in the marketplace gain a fuller picture of how litigation finance operates in differing contexts.
"Awareness of litigation funding is very, very high. It's nearly 100%," he said. "But the depth of understanding necessary for lawyers to bring up with clients or for in-house lawyer to take litigation finance as an option to the C-suite, that can be addressed through education."
One area of opportunity is corporate portfolios. Only 15% of capital currently committed is in portfolios from corporations and other entities such as universities. But as corporations gain comfort with using litigation finance to unlock the value of claims, the tides could turn and demand could ultimately outpace supply.
"I don't think it's going to happen overnight," Agee said. "It will take years, not months, to really achieve the depth of understanding in the market to bring demand up to its potential."
Read More
Litigation Finance Users Say They'd Do It Again, Survey Finds
CFOs Fueling Rise of Litigation Finance, Survey Says
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 2Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 3The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 4Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 5As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250