$21M Fine Marks End of Alstom's Global Bribery Case
Alstom Network UK, the London-based subsidiary of French transportation company Alstom SA, was ordered Monday in Southwark Crown Court to pay $19.2 million in fines and nearly $1.8 million in costs within 28 days.
November 26, 2019 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A London court has ordered Alstom Network UK Ltd. to pay 16.4 million pounds, or $21 million, for a bribery scheme in Tunisia, bringing to a close a decade-long corruption investigation that spanned the globe.
The London-based subsidiary of French transportation company Alstom SA was convicted last year of conspiracy to corrupt and ordered Monday in Southwark Crown Court to pay 15 million pounds in fines, or $19.2 million, and nearly 1.4 million pounds in costs, or $1.8 million, within 28 days.
The firm funneled 2.4 million euros, or $2.6 million, in bribes through a shell company to win a 79.9 million-euro contract, equivalent to $88.8 million, to supply trams to Transtu, which operates a public transportation rail network in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia, according to the U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office. The agency also stated that Alstom created fraudulent paperwork to conceal the bribery payments.
"Alstom is satisfied that, as far as it is concerned, this sentence brings to an end the long-running U.K. proceedings in respect of this historic conduct," the firm said in a prepared statement.
The company also noted that it was acquitted of three other bribery and corruption charges related to transport contracts in Hungary, India and Poland, as were several of its former executives.
In 2016, a subsidiary of the firm, Alstom Power Ltd., pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe Lithuanian politicians and officials and was fined more than $7.7 million and ordered to pay $14 million in compensation and nearly $900,000 in costs. Two employees of the same subsidiary were sent to prison for three to four years for their roles in the scheme.
In the United States, Alstom pleaded guilty in 2014 to paying $75 million to secure $4 billion in projects around the world that generated $300 million in profits. To resolve the case, Alstom agreed to pay a $772 million fine, which was the largest-ever foreign bribery resolution with the Justice Department.
And earlier this month, a federal jury in Connecticut found a British citizen working in Paris for Alstom guilty of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and money laundering for paying bribes to officials in Indonesia.
Investigators began eyeing Alstom and its subsidiaries in 2009, when questions arose about the firm's actions in international power and transport projects. The probe involved more than 30 countries, including the U.S., Canada, France, Sweden, Switzerland and Tunisia.
After Alstom was sentenced this week in London, Lisa Osofsky, director of the Serious Fraud Office, said in a written statement that the investigation "shows that we will work tirelessly with law enforcement around the world to root out bribery and corruption."
Alstom, meanwhile, asserted it had undergone "significant changes" over the past 10 years, "not only structurally and in relation to fields in which it operates, but also in relation to culture and personnel."
The company added it is "committed to being a leading company for the purposes of ethics and compliance, not only in France but also internationally."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250