$21M Fine Marks End of Alstom's Global Bribery Case
Alstom Network UK, the London-based subsidiary of French transportation company Alstom SA, was ordered Monday in Southwark Crown Court to pay $19.2 million in fines and nearly $1.8 million in costs within 28 days.
November 26, 2019 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A London court has ordered Alstom Network UK Ltd. to pay 16.4 million pounds, or $21 million, for a bribery scheme in Tunisia, bringing to a close a decade-long corruption investigation that spanned the globe.
The London-based subsidiary of French transportation company Alstom SA was convicted last year of conspiracy to corrupt and ordered Monday in Southwark Crown Court to pay 15 million pounds in fines, or $19.2 million, and nearly 1.4 million pounds in costs, or $1.8 million, within 28 days.
The firm funneled 2.4 million euros, or $2.6 million, in bribes through a shell company to win a 79.9 million-euro contract, equivalent to $88.8 million, to supply trams to Transtu, which operates a public transportation rail network in Tunis, the capital of Tunisia, according to the U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office. The agency also stated that Alstom created fraudulent paperwork to conceal the bribery payments.
"Alstom is satisfied that, as far as it is concerned, this sentence brings to an end the long-running U.K. proceedings in respect of this historic conduct," the firm said in a prepared statement.
The company also noted that it was acquitted of three other bribery and corruption charges related to transport contracts in Hungary, India and Poland, as were several of its former executives.
In 2016, a subsidiary of the firm, Alstom Power Ltd., pleaded guilty to conspiring to bribe Lithuanian politicians and officials and was fined more than $7.7 million and ordered to pay $14 million in compensation and nearly $900,000 in costs. Two employees of the same subsidiary were sent to prison for three to four years for their roles in the scheme.
In the United States, Alstom pleaded guilty in 2014 to paying $75 million to secure $4 billion in projects around the world that generated $300 million in profits. To resolve the case, Alstom agreed to pay a $772 million fine, which was the largest-ever foreign bribery resolution with the Justice Department.
And earlier this month, a federal jury in Connecticut found a British citizen working in Paris for Alstom guilty of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and money laundering for paying bribes to officials in Indonesia.
Investigators began eyeing Alstom and its subsidiaries in 2009, when questions arose about the firm's actions in international power and transport projects. The probe involved more than 30 countries, including the U.S., Canada, France, Sweden, Switzerland and Tunisia.
After Alstom was sentenced this week in London, Lisa Osofsky, director of the Serious Fraud Office, said in a written statement that the investigation "shows that we will work tirelessly with law enforcement around the world to root out bribery and corruption."
Alstom, meanwhile, asserted it had undergone "significant changes" over the past 10 years, "not only structurally and in relation to fields in which it operates, but also in relation to culture and personnel."
The company added it is "committed to being a leading company for the purposes of ethics and compliance, not only in France but also internationally."
Read More:
Daily Dicta: What Went Wrong for the Defense in Alstom Exec's FCPA Trial
New Anti-Bribery Alert Shows Companies How to Avoid FCPA Land Mines
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1BOI Reports: What Business Owners and Attorneys Should Know
- 2SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 3Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 4The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 5Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250