In Africa Bribery Scam, Feds Estimate Lost Mining Rights Worth $190 Million
In a brief, Wilson Sonsini partner Moe Fodeman wrote that U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis should not worry about any delay caused by the restitution process.
November 27, 2019 at 04:53 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Months after a Brooklyn federal judge found that the former shareholders of a Canadian mining company are owed restitution after losing money in a bribery scheme in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, federal prosecutors agreed that the lost mining rights may be worth up to $190 million.
The estimate represents progress toward being made whole for the clients of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, though a mining valuation expert estimated that their company's share of the mine could have been worth as much as $1.8 billion if it had been developed.
Whether the shareholders would get any restitution at all was the subject of intense debate after OZ Africa Management GP, a subsidiary of the hedge fund known until recently as Och-Ziff Capital Management Group (now Sculptor Capital Management), pleaded guilty in 2016 to conspiracy to bribe foreign officials in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The companies agreed to pay a penalty of more than $200 million, and in early 2018, the court found that the shareholders were not entitled to restitution. Along with OZ Africa, federal prosecutors had argued that the shareholders weren't victims.
In August, U.S. Senior District Judge Nicholas Garaufis reversed the 2018 decision, finding that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act defines "victim" broadly and that the shareholders may be compensated for their lost opportunity to mine the property. He asked for further briefing on the appropriate amount for restitution.
In a letter filed Friday, Assistant U.S. Attorney David Pitluck wrote that the value of the mining rights was between $150 million and $188.7 million. Attempting to assess the mine's value as if it had been developed would be "highly speculative," he wrote, noting that Garaufis had asked for a mining rights valuation instead.
"At the time that the defendant committed the crime to which it pled guilty, the defendant valued the Kalukundi mining rights no lower than $150 million," Pitluck wrote. "Having used this valuation to harm the victims, the defendant surely must accept it now, when the time has come for the defendant to compensate the victims for the defendant's crime."
In a brief filed the same day, Wilson Sonsini partner Moe Fodeman wrote that Garaufis should not worry about any delay caused by the restitution process. No individual defendants are waiting on a decision about their freedom, he wrote, because no individuals were prosecuted.
"The Defendant is part of a corporation — a large hedge fund," Fodeman wrote. "It has the funds to make its victims whole. Its victims have persistently fought for that right. Any 'burden' here on the sentencing process cannot outweigh that right."
Charles Gilman, a partner at Cahill Gordon & Reindel, which is representing OZ Africa, did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. In late September, he filed a memo asking Garaufis to reconsider his order, arguing that the shareholders' group did not directly own any mining rights and cannot claim restitution for injury to the company.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250