In $10B Contract Suit Against Pentagon, Amazon Confronts Trump's 'Relentless' Criticism
Amazon's unsealed complaint said Trump "launched repeated public and behind-the-scenes attacks to steer the JEDI Contract away" from the company. Microsoft won the lucrative award.
December 09, 2019 at 11:11 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Newly unsealed court papers in Amazon.com Inc.'s blockbuster suit against the U.S. Defense Department accused President Donald Trump and others of "undue influence" as contributing to the technology company losing a $10 billion cloud-computing contract to rival Microsoft Corp.
Amazon Web Services, represented by Morrison & Foerster and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, is suing the Pentagon in U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Washington-based court that hears disputes over government contracts. A redacted version of the company's complaint, filed in late November, was released Monday.
Trump's animus toward Amazon and its chief executive, Jeff Bezos, is widely documented, and the company contends in the complaint that "improper pressure" from Trump contributed to Amazon losing the lucrative award. Trump has lashed out often at Bezos over his ownership of The Washington Post, a media outlet that, like many others, has published articles critical of his leadership and policy stances before and after he took office. The president regularly derides the news company as the "Amazon Washington Post."
"Irrespective of any artificial steps the Administration might have taken to sterilize the record, it was impossible to shield DoD from the bias exhibited and undue influence exerted by President Trump and others. That improper and unlawful intervention contributed directly to an arbitrary and capricious award that is contrary to procurement law and contrary to the interests of our national security."
In November, Mark Esper, the Defense Department secretary, denied that any bias played into the Pentagon's decision to award the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, or JEDI, contract to Microsoft. "I am confident it was conducted freely and fairly, without any type of outside influence," Esper said, according to media reports.
Lawyers for Microsoft, represented by Robert Metzger of the Washington litigation boutique Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, have intervened in the Federal Claims case to defend the Pentagon's award. Metzger and a Microsoft spokesperson did not immediately comment Monday.
A Defense Department spokesperson said in a statement Monday:
"This source selection decision was made by an expert team of career public servants and military officers from across the Department of Defense and in accordance with DOD's normal source-selection process. There were no external influences on the source selection decision. The department is confident in the JEDI award and remains focused on getting this critical capability into the hands of our warfighters as quickly and efficiently as possible."
Amazon's lawyers contend in their complaint that Trump's "attacks were relentless, and he resorted to increasingly aggressive tactics to carry out his apparent personal goal of preventing Mr. Bezos and [Amazon Web Services] from receiving the JEDI contract." The suit alleged Trump "launched repeated public and behind-the-scenes attacks to steer the JEDI Contract away from AWS to harm his perceived political enemy—Jeffrey P. Bezos." The complaint cites numerous statements and tweets from the president, including remarks at a July 2019 press conference at which Trump said he was looking "very seriously" at the JEDI contract.
"DoD's substantial and pervasive errors are hard to understand and impossible to assess separate and apart from the President's repeatedly expressed determination to, in the words of the President himself, 'screw Amazon,'" Amazon's complaint said.
The 103-page complaint alleged Trump's intervention "puts the very integrity of the government procurement process in question" and served to "artificially level the playing field between AS and its competitors, including Microsoft."
The JEDI contract is a 10-year deal providing cloud-computing services to the Defense Department. Amazon, Microsoft, OBM and Oracle were vying for the contract. Oracle, represented by Craig Holman, who leads the government contracts practice at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, has a pending appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Morrison & Foerster's Kevin Mullen is counsel of record to Amazon. The company also hired a Gibson Dunn team, including Theodore Olson, F. Joseph Warin, Theodore Boutrous Jr. and Andrew Tulumello.
Boutrous, a leading First Amendment scholar, has successfully represented members of the media in suits challenging the Trump White House's restrictions on reporters. Olson, a former George W. Bush administration U.S. solicitor general, is one of the firm's most visible Supreme Court advocates. Warin leads Gibson Dunn's litigation team in Washington and serves as co-chair of the firm's global white-collar and investigations practice.
The lawsuit asked the Federal Claims court to enjoin the award of the JEDI contract to Microsoft "pending reevaluation and a new award decision." The case is assigned to Judge Patricia Campbell-Smith.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250