'Imagination Is the Only Limit' on Presidential Abuses of Power': Barry Berke Urges Trump's Impeachment
Berke and GOP counsel Stephen Castor were among those appearing before a House committee to present evidence gathered in the impeachment inquiry.
December 09, 2019 at 01:23 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
House Judiciary Committee counsel Barry Berke made the case for impeaching President Donald Trump on Monday, laying out three offenses that he said are grounds to potentially remove the president from office.
During his 30-minute opening statement, the Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel partner argued there are three main examples of "high crimes and misdemeanors" committed by Trump: abuse of power, betrayal of the national interest and corruption of elections.
Berke, along with the House Intelligence Committee's chief investigator Daniel Goldman and GOP counsel Stephen Castor, appeared before the House Judiciary Committee on Monday to present evidence gathered in the impeachment inquiry.
They gave their testimony days after Speaker Nancy Pelosi instructed Democrats to move forward with articles of impeachment against Trump. The Judiciary Committee also heard testimony last week from four constitutional scholars about impeachment.
Berke's argument focused largely on the conduct by Trump in pushing Ukraine to investigate his political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden, in exchange for releasing military aid to the country. Berke also touched upon conduct from special counsel Robert Mueller's probe, specifically Trump's efforts to get then-White House counsel Don McGahn to have Mueller fired and then create a false record over that attempt.
That signals that articles of impeachment against Trump will focus on Ukraine, as it has for much of the inquiry, but reach back to the Mueller probe to establish a larger pattern of conduct by the president.
It's that pattern of allegedly corrupt behavior that Berke said is reason for the House to impeach Trump, and to do it quickly before the November 2020 election. Berke said it's possible Trump could attempt to interfere in the presidential election again.
And he pointed to testimony from constitutional law scholar Michael Gerhardt before the committee last week, when Gerhardt said, "If Congress fails to impeach here, then the impeachment process has lost all meaning."
"If, in fact, President Trump can get away with what he did again, our imagination is the only limit to what President Trump may do next, or what a future president may do next to abuse his or her power to serve his own personal interests over the nations," Berke said.
Berke's argument also focused on Trump's intent, and the president's reliance on his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, in seeking to enact a personal agenda in Ukraine.
And Berke pushed back against criticism from Republicans that the record is incomplete on impeachment.
"The reason we have not heard from all the witnesses and documents is because President Trump has obstructed the investigation," Berke said, teeing up obstruction of Congress to be another article of impeachment.
GOP lawmakers argued after Berke's testimony that he violated House rules by "impugning" Trump's motives. But House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler rejected the charge, saying that at a hearing about impeaching Trump, "none of us should find it surprising that we are hearing testimony that is critical of the president."
During his opening statement, Castor argued that Democrats are pursuing an improperly run impeachment inquiry. And he said lawmakers failed to follow proper procedures for subpoenas.
Those are similar to criticisms leveled by White House counsel Pat Cipollone. Both a House Judiciary Committee staff report on impeachment procedures, as well as the House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry report, have said those arguments lack merit and are not based in fact.
Castor also suggested that when a subpoenaed witness, Charles Kupperman, went to court to contest the demand, Democrats chose not to pursue the case because they "didn't like the presiding judge," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon of the District of Columbia.
"Very simply, the evidence of the Democrat's impeachment inquiry does not support the conclusion that President Trump used his power for his own personal political path," Castor said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250