Ex-FBI Lawyer Lisa Page, Taunted by Trump, Sues DOJ and FBI for Violating Her Privacy by Leaking Texts
Page has hired Arnold & Porter's Amy Jeffress and Kaitlin Konkel for the lawsuit.
December 10, 2019 at 02:58 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer who has been the target of Republican attacks over texts she exchanged about President Donald Trump, filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the Department of Justice and FBI, alleging that agency officials violated the Privacy Act by leaking her text messages to reporters.
Page alleges that "officials who authorized the disclosure" of her text messages with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok "and their allies sought to use, and ultimately did use, the messages to promote the false narrative that Plaintiff and others at the FBI were biased against President Trump, had conspired to undermine him, and otherwise had engaged in allegedly criminal acts, including treason."
She is being represented by Amy Jeffress and Kaitlin Konkel of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer. The firm is also representing former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe in his lawsuit against the Trump administration.
Jeffress is a prominent Washington, D.C., lawyer, who joined Arnold & Porter in 2014. She was set to be called as a defense witness in ex-Obama White House counsel Greg Craig's trial this summer but ultimately did not testify.
Page is seeking a jury trial, as well as a minimum of $1,000 in damages as permitted under the Privacy Act, attorneys' fees and costs and "such other relief as this Court deems just."
"I sued the Department of Justice and FBI today," Page tweeted Tuesday. "I take little joy in having done so. But what they did in leaking my messages to the press was not only wrong, it was illegal."
Tuesday's complaint alleges that Page's texts with Strzok, with whom she had an affair, were shared with a group of reporters "for multiple improper reasons, including to elevate DOJ's standing with the president following the president's repeated public attacks of the department and its head, Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions III."
Page's attorneys wrote that the texts were revealed the night before then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein testified before Congress in December 2017, "and the department's failure to respond to congressional oversight requests before the hearing would open the door for Republican committee members to criticize Rosenstein and DOJ for failing to vigorously pursue what the members viewed as evidence of a 'witch hunt' against President Trump."
"Disclosure of the text messages before Rosenstein's hearing would serve multiple goals: it would protect the deputy attorney general from criticism during his testimony; it would show that the department was addressing matters of concern to the president; and it would dominate coverage of the hearing, which otherwise could be unfavorable for the department," the complaint states.
"And the department could achieve all of this at the relatively low cost (in the department's view) of the privacy of two FBI employees: Ms. Page, a longtime DOJ and FBI attorney, and Mr. Strzok, a career FBI agent," it continues.
It further alleges that DOJ officials, including then-spokesperson Sarah Isgur Flores, would not allow reporters to source the messages back to the agency, "so that the department could pretend that the reporters had obtained the messages from Congress and plausibly deny having invited reporters to the department to view them."
The lawsuit also points to the release of a report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on Monday, which determined that while there were errors in how the FBI conducted its probe into Trump, it was not launched due to any bias against him.
Page discussed the disclosure of the text messages in an interview with The Daily Beast last week, her first public remarks since she left the FBI last year. She criticized the Justice Department for allowing reporters to review "a cherry-picked selection of my text messages" ahead of Rosenstein's congressional testimony.
And Page said she didn't view her texts with Strzok as being violations of the Hatch Act, which block employees like her from public partisan and political acts. Those texts include one where she asks Strzok for reassurance that Trump wouldn't win the presidency, and Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."
Page's affair and texts with Strzok made national headlines, as both worked on special counsel Robert Mueller's probe at one point. Republicans seized on their texts to fuel claims of an anti-Trump bias at the U.S. Department of Justice and FBI.
Page's lawsuit Tuesday alleges that she has suffered "severe harm" as a result of the texts being released, including dozens of attacks from Trump himself.
Mueller removed Strzok from his team after the texts with Page were uncovered, and the agent was eventually fired from the FBI.
Strzok also filed a lawsuit in August against the Justice Department, FBI and top agency leaders challenging his firing from the federal government over the texts with Page.
"The campaign to fire Strzok included constant tweets and other disparaging statements by the president, as well as direct appeals from the president to then-Attorney General Jefferson Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray to fire Strzok, which were chronicled in the press," Strzok's attorneys at Zuckerman Spaeder and Heller, Huron, Chertkof & Salzman wrote in the complaint.
Read the lawsuit:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250