Hueston Hennigan Sues DHS and ICE to Revive Hotline for Detained Immigrants Featured on 'Orange Is the New Black'
The firm's lawyers write that in "the most perverse form of art imitating life imitating art" the government shut down free access to the hotline after it appeared in a plotline in the popular Netflix prison series.
December 10, 2019 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A California nonprofit is suing the federal agencies that oversee immigration enforcement claiming that they illegally shut down free access to a hotline that allowed immigrants in detention to report abuse, find resources, and connect with loved ones.
Freedom for Immigrants (FFI), represented by lawyers at Los Angeles litigation boutique Hueston Hennigan, sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, claiming the agencies and federal officials retaliated against the organization after its hotline was featured in a plotline in the popular Netflix television series "Orange Is the New Black" this summer.
In the seventh season of the show, which began streaming on Netflix in July, one character provided another potentially facing deportation with a four-digit telephone extension to contact FFI's hotline for help. "You gotta be careful though," said the character providing the hotline number. "Apparently as soon as Big Brother figures out you're using the hotline, they shut it down."
Lawyers for the FFI, which has run the National Immigration Detention Hotline since December 2013, claim that the government's action is the "the most perverse form of art imitating life imitating art." Two weeks after the new season of the show began airing, they claim, the government pulled the plug on free access to the hotline.
"ICE's shutdown of the hotline violates FFI's First Amendment rights to be free from retaliation for engaging in protected speech, and to speak freely to, and associate with, persons in immigration detention," wrote the organization's lawyers, led by Hueston Hennigan's Moez Kaba. "The shutdown also violates the First Amendment rights of detained immigrants, who, without the hotline, either are unable to contact FFI at all or can only do so by paying exorbitant fees, as calls can cost upwards of $1 a minute," they wrote.
Reached by phone Tuesday, Kaba said that as the son of immigrants, it was important for him to take on work for people who are held in detention. The complaint alleges a pattern of federal officials retaliating against FFI and its programs, which includes a national network of visitation programs at immigrant detainment facilities. The complaint claims that after officials with FFI have spoken out about the conditions immigrants face in detention in the past, immigration officials have limited the organizations access to those facilities. Kaba said that Christina Fialho, co-executive director of FFI, reached out to the firm to litigate after access to its free hotline was cut off.
"When it comes to taking cases all the way that's something that our firm really prides itself on," Kaba said.
Immigrant detainees formerly could dial *9233# for free access to volunteers who could help them file formal complaints about alleged abuses or attempt to locate family members from whom they'd been separated. According to Kaba, detainees are now forced to pay to call FFI, which has led the organization to buy prepaid phone cards and distributed them to detainment facilities across the country. Kaba says that ICE's explanation for the cutoff was initially that it was part of a routine pro bono audit, but officials have since shifted to accuse FFI of improperly arranging three-way calls and call forwarding. Kaba says that's something FFI trains operators specifically not to do—and something that isn't explicitly forbidden.
"Their shifting explanation shows there's no rational basis for their actions," Kaba says.
The firm is seeking an injunction reinstating the hotline and barring ICE and ICE officials from interfering with the First Amendment rights of the organization and detainees.
Representatives of DHS didn't respond to messages seeking comment Tuesday. A spokesperson for ICE declined to comment but pointed to prior comments that the allegation is simply not true, and the Enforcement and Removal Operations verified the pro bono speed dial for FFI was removed from the agency's pro bono list in October 2018, predating the TV show by nearly a year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250