Despite Withering ABA Assessment, Senate Confirms Lawrence VanDyke to the Ninth Circuit
Lawrence VanDyke, the former solicitor general of Nevada and Montana, received a "not qualified" rating from judicial vetters at the American Bar Association and his nomination faced vocal opposition from LBGTQ groups and gun control advocates.
December 11, 2019 at 04:54 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The Senate has voted to confirm Lawrence VanDyke to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, making him the 10th of President Donald Trump's nominees on the nation's largest appellate court and the president's 50th circuit court appointee.
In a 51-44 vote, the Senate on Wednesday confirmed VanDyke, whose nomination had been the source of bitter partisan debate.
VanDyke is set to fill the seat of Nevada-based Judge Jay Bybee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, who announced last year that he would take on senior status as soon as his replacement was confirmed. Nevada's Democratic senators, however, opposed VanDyke's nomination, maintaining that his four-year stint as the state's solicitor general didn't demonstrate sufficient ties to the state. VanDyke, they pointed out, didn't go to school in Nevada, didn't grow up there and hasn't visited the state in the past year, as he's worked in Washington, D.C., as deputy assistant attorney general for the environment and natural resources division at the U.S. Department of Justice.
Democratic opposition to VanDyke's nomination was bolstered by a "not qualified" rating he received from judicial vetters at the American Bar Association in October. The ABA vetters' asserted in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee that VanDyke "is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules." The letter also said that VanDyke "would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably members of the LGBTQ community."
Republican members of the Senate Judiciary criticized the ABA's rating process as biased against conservative lawyers at a hearing on VanDyke's nomination in October. VanDyke, at the hearing, broke down in tears when asked about the ABA's assessment of his ability to be fair to LGBTQ parties. After composing himself, VanDyke said, "I didn't say that. I don't believe that. It is a fundamental belief of mine that all people are created in the image of God, and they should all be treated with dignity and respect."
The vote on VanDyke comes a day after the Senate confirmed Southern California prosecutor Patrick Bumatay in a 53-40 vote, making him the first openly gay appellate judge and the first of Filipino descent appointed by Trump.
Prior to a party-line vote on VanDyke's nomination in the Senate Judiciary Committee last month, committee chairman Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, noted that VanDyke and Bumatay shared the witness table at their confirmation hearing and that Bumatay said he would be comfortable with VanDyke as a judge or a colleague. Graham said at the hearing that if VanDyke's four years representing Nevada as solicitor general didn't show significant enough ties to the state, he didn't know what would. "This was a tough hearing," Graham said of VanDyke's confirmation hearing. "His reaction to me told me a lot about who he is." Graham said that VanDyke's appearance before the committee showed that "though he's a social conservative National Rifle Association member that he can actually do his job" as a federal appellate judge.
Read more:
SoCal Prosecutor Patrick Bumatay Confirmed to Ninth Circuit Seat
Senate Judiciary Moves Ninth Circuit Nominations Forward in Party-Line Vote
Ignored or Attacked, ABA Committee Persists in Ranking Judicial Nominees
ABA 'Not Qualified' Rating and Blue Slips Dominate Hearing for Ninth Circuit Nominees
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
Trending Stories
- 1SurePoint Acquires Legal Practice Management Company ZenCase
- 2Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 3The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 4Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 5As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250