Judge Knocks Down Mike Flynn's 'Ambush' Claims
"The court summarily disposes of Mr. Flynn's arguments that the FBI conducted an ambush interview for the purpose of trapping him into making false statements," U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan said Monday.
December 16, 2019 at 03:37 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A federal judge on Monday rejected former national security adviser Michael Flynn's broad attack against the U.S. Justice Department and FBI, setting a sentencing hearing for Jan. 28 after concluding prosecutors were not hiding evidence and that the former Trump administration aide had not been pressured to plead guilty.
In a 92-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan of the District of Columbia found there was no basis for Flynn's attacks on federal prosecutors, which included claims the Justice Department withheld favorable evidence from him. Flynn also alleged the FBI entrapped him in an interview that addressed his contacts with Russia's top diplomat to the U.S. during the presidential transition.
Flynn pleaded guilty in 2017 to lying to federal investigators about his communications with Sergey Kislyak, the former Russian ambassador to the United States. His new sentencing date is the third has received since admitting to that charge.
"The court summarily disposes of Mr. Flynn's arguments that the FBI conducted an ambush interview for the purpose of trapping him into making false statements and that the government pressured him to enter a guilty plea," Sullivan wrote in Monday's ruling. "The record proves otherwise."
In December 2018, his initial sentencing hearing was derailed when Sullivan suggested he was considering sentencing Flynn to a prison term. Federal trial judges have broad discretion to order prison terms even in scenarios where prosecutors might back probation.
Flynn, represented at the time by a defense team from Covington & Burling, asked to delay the sentencing so that he could continue cooperating with federal prosecutors. But in the ensuing months, Flynn turned against prosecutors, dropping his Covington defense team to hire Sidney Powell, a vocal critic of the special counsel office investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Powell accused the Justice Department of misconduct in a push not to withdraw Flynn's guilty plea but to knock out the case entirely. She argued the government had violated obligations to disclose evidence benefiting Flynn.
In his ruling Monday, Sullivan delivered a firm repudiation of those claims.
"The sworn statements of Mr. Flynn and his former counsel belie his new claims of innocence and his new assertions that he was pressured into pleading guilty to making materially false statements to the FBI," Sullivan said in Monday's ruling. "And it is undisputed that Mr. Flynn not only made those false statements to the FBI agents, but he also made the same false statements to the Vice President and senior White House officials, who, in turn, repeated Mr. Flynn's false statements to the American people on national television."
A second sentencing hearing had been set for Dec. 18, on the one-year anniversary of his initial sentencing date. But that hearing was canceled ahead of the release of the Justice Department inspector general's long awaited report on the roots of the Russia investigation.
The Justice Department's watchdog found that the department was justified in opening an investigation into possible coordination between Russia and associates of the Trump campaign, including Flynn. The inspector general also found there was no evidence that anti-Trump bias played into the opening of the probe.
But the report also documented significant missteps by the FBI in its pursuit of warrants to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
Judge Sullivan's ruling in United States v. Flynn is posted below:
Read more:
'Divorced From Facts': Prosecutors Condemn Michael Flynn's 'Conspiracy Theories'
Michael Flynn's Sentencing Judge Is Ready to Roll, Spurns Defense Play for Delay
Flynn's Ex-Covington Lawyers Defend Conduct Amid Court Scrutiny
Judge Sullivan Has Read Some of Sidney Powell's Book (Or at Least the Part About Him)
Michael Flynn Hires Mueller-Critic Sidney Powell After Dumping Covington Team
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readMoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250