Debevoise Dominates Sackler Family Fees Stemming From Opioid Scandal
Purdue Pharma has paid several Big Law firms for their legal work on behalf of Sackler family members, including Debevoise, McDermott and Norton Rose, according to new court documents.
December 17, 2019 at 06:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Purdue Pharma, the embattled pharmaceutical company at the center of the opioid crisis, has paid more than $17.5 million in legal fees on behalf of the Sackler family to more than a dozen law firms, according to new documents filed in the company's bankruptcy.
Debevoise & Plimpton was paid the majority of that legal spend—more than $11.4 million—for its legal work for the Sacklers from the first half of 2018 through early 2019, according to an audit filed Monday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York, where the company is undergoing Chapter 11 restructuring,
Most payments began around the time individual Sackler family members, who have controlled Purdue, were named defendants in various opioid-related litigation.
Debevoise's senior chair, litigation partner and leader of the firm's strategic crisis response and solutions group, Mary Jo White, is representing four family members.
After Debevoise, Joseph Hage Aaronson incurred nearly $4.9 million from early 2018 through early 2019. The firm represents another group of Sackler family members.
Representatives for Debevoise and Joseph Hage Aaronson did not immediately return requests for comment.
Other firms' bills to Purdue on behalf of Sackler family members between 2016 and 2019 include:
- $557,000 to Choate, Hall & Stewart
- $248,000 to Luther Strange and Associates
- $118,000 to Cohen & Gresser
- $89,000 to Parson Behle & Latimer (for former Purdue chairman and president Richard Sackler
- $54,000 to Norton Rose Fulbright
- $47,000 to Cameron Mittleman
- $32,000 to Kelley Jasons McGowan Spinelli Hanna & Reber
- $31,000 to McDermott Will & Emery
- $28,000 to Lum, Drasco & Positan
- $22,000 to Mulinix Goerke & Meyer
- $18,000 to Fitch Law Partners
- $3,000 to Hawkins Parnell & Young
The audit, which was completed by AlixPartners in coordination with Purdue's Chapter 11 proceedings, reports on firms' legal expenses incurred from 2016 through the first quarter of 2019. The audit said all of the legal expenses have since been paid by Purdue on behalf of Sackler family members and notes that payments from Purdue on behalf of the Sackler family ended Feb. 28 of this year. The audit said it did not find any indemnity payments before 2016.
Not all firms that have worked with Purdue and the Sackler family were named in the audit. For instance, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison litigation partner David Bernick is representing another group of Sackler family members in opioid litigation.
On the company side, Davis Polk & Wardwell, led by global restructuring head Marshall Huebner, is guiding Purdue through its Chapter 11, which began Sept. 15. According to the firm's first monthly fee statement, Davis Polk requested $2.5 million in compensation and more than $90,000 in expenses for work in the second half of September.
|Read More:
NYC Adds Sackler Family Members as Purdue Pharma Owners to Opioids Lawsuit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTwo Judges. 60-Plus Years on the Bench. Plenty of Advice.
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Litigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: After Two Big Wins for Plaintiffs, a Defense Verdict for Infant Formula Makers
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250