Daily Dicta: A Win for Winston (And Every Parent Who Volunteers in Elementary Schools)
"Great Minds' interpretation cannot be correct," wrote Senior Judge Jerome Farris of the Ninth Circuit for the unanimous panel, noting that it would lead to "absurd results.
January 06, 2020 at 02:45 PM
3 minute read
When my kids were little, I left my job at The National Law Journal in 2004 to work part-time as a freelancer for ALM before rejoining the company in 2009.
During those five years, I volunteered every week at my son and daughter's school—and much of the work involved making photocopies for teachers using the school's beast of a copier.
With this context in mind, I heartily applaud and congratulate a team from Winston & Strawn led by Jennifer Golinveaux (with backing by amicus Creative Commons and lead counsel Andrew Gass of Latham & Watkins) for their win on behalf of Office Depot on Dec. 27 before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The issue? Photocopies for teachers.
Office Depot was sued by Great Minds, which publishes the widely-used math curriculum Eureka Math. Represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's Christopher Sprigman, Great Minds claimed Office Depot infringed its copyrights by reproducing educational materials on behalf of schools.
That is, sometimes schools (lacking parent volunteers, or perhaps recognizing we are hapless and can't fix paper jams?) simply pay Office Depot to make copies of worksheets and whatnot for teachers to use in their classrooms.
Great Minds conceded the school's own use and distribution of copies of the material was non-commercial and thus permitted under the terms of the copyright license. The issue was who made the copies—under Great Minds' theory, it would be fine for a teacher (or volunteer) to do it at Office Depot, but not OK for the school to pay an Office Depot worker to do it.
"Great Minds' interpretation cannot be correct," wrote Senior Judge Jerome Farris for the unanimous panel, noting that it would lead to "absurd results."
Great Minds previously struck out before the Second Circuit when it sued another copy shop, FedEx Office, and the Ninth Circuit panel followed suit.
"The license itself provides no basis to distinguish between permitted copies of Eureka Math made by a licensee's own employees (e.g., school teachers or staff) versus those made by a third-party contractor (e.g., Office Depot employees). We decline to read such a distinction into the license," Farris wrote in affirming the lower court's dismissal of the complaint and denying leave to amend.
The winning Winston team also included Diana Hughes Leiden, Thomas Kearney, Irina Lyapis and Alyse Ritvo.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Litigators of the Week: $284M and Counting From Elite Universities Accused of Price-Fixing
Voir Dire for Beginners: 2 Southwestern Law Alums Give Students an Intro to Jury Selection
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 2Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 3FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 4'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
- 5Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250