Daily Dicta: A Win for Winston (And Every Parent Who Volunteers in Elementary Schools)
"Great Minds' interpretation cannot be correct," wrote Senior Judge Jerome Farris of the Ninth Circuit for the unanimous panel, noting that it would lead to "absurd results.
January 06, 2020 at 02:45 PM
3 minute read
When my kids were little, I left my job at The National Law Journal in 2004 to work part-time as a freelancer for ALM before rejoining the company in 2009.
During those five years, I volunteered every week at my son and daughter's school—and much of the work involved making photocopies for teachers using the school's beast of a copier.
With this context in mind, I heartily applaud and congratulate a team from Winston & Strawn led by Jennifer Golinveaux (with backing by amicus Creative Commons and lead counsel Andrew Gass of Latham & Watkins) for their win on behalf of Office Depot on Dec. 27 before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The issue? Photocopies for teachers.
Office Depot was sued by Great Minds, which publishes the widely-used math curriculum Eureka Math. Represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's Christopher Sprigman, Great Minds claimed Office Depot infringed its copyrights by reproducing educational materials on behalf of schools.
That is, sometimes schools (lacking parent volunteers, or perhaps recognizing we are hapless and can't fix paper jams?) simply pay Office Depot to make copies of worksheets and whatnot for teachers to use in their classrooms.
Great Minds conceded the school's own use and distribution of copies of the material was non-commercial and thus permitted under the terms of the copyright license. The issue was who made the copies—under Great Minds' theory, it would be fine for a teacher (or volunteer) to do it at Office Depot, but not OK for the school to pay an Office Depot worker to do it.
"Great Minds' interpretation cannot be correct," wrote Senior Judge Jerome Farris for the unanimous panel, noting that it would lead to "absurd results."
Great Minds previously struck out before the Second Circuit when it sued another copy shop, FedEx Office, and the Ninth Circuit panel followed suit.
"The license itself provides no basis to distinguish between permitted copies of Eureka Math made by a licensee's own employees (e.g., school teachers or staff) versus those made by a third-party contractor (e.g., Office Depot employees). We decline to read such a distinction into the license," Farris wrote in affirming the lower court's dismissal of the complaint and denying leave to amend.
The winning Winston team also included Diana Hughes Leiden, Thomas Kearney, Irina Lyapis and Alyse Ritvo.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Jeffrey Kessler and Steve Berman Reach a Settlement With the NCAA that Reshapes College Sports
Litigators of the Week: $284M and Counting From Elite Universities Accused of Price-Fixing
Voir Dire for Beginners: 2 Southwestern Law Alums Give Students an Intro to Jury Selection
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250