And the LOTW Runners Up...
Honorable mention goes to lawyers from Cravath; Covington & Burling and Quinn E.manuel
January 24, 2020 at 02:04 PM
2 minute read
Our runners up for Litigator of the Week include Cravath Swaine & Moore partners Peter Barbur, Rory Leraris, Evan Chesler and Kevin Orsini. They prevailed on behalf of American Express Co., convincing U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis in the Eastern District of New York to shut down an antitrust suit brought by two putative classes of merchant plaintiffs.
Garaufis ruled that the merchant plaintiffs who accept AmEx cards must individually arbitrate their complaints about the company's anti-steering provisions, which bar merchants from discouraging customers from using an AmEx card at the point of sale. As for the merchants who don't accept AmEx, the judge granted the Cravath team's motion to dismiss their claims.
Covington & Burling's Paul Schmidt and Colleen Hennessey of Peabody & Arnold scored a major win for Hoffmann-LaRoche before the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Supreme Court in a 17-year fight over the acne medicine Accutane.
At issue: Does Accutane cause ulcerative colitis? In 2017, the trial court judge excluded testimony by the plaintiffs' experts about the link. On Jan. 17, the appellate court upheld that decision—and likely to put end to 3,231 individual cases by people who blamed Accutane for their chronic inflammatory bowel disease.
Carey Ramos, Sam Williamson and Xiao Liu of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan scored for five Chinese banks in a $150 million fight in the Southern District of New York.
The dispute began when Nike and Converse won a $1.8 billion default judgment against 636 counterfeiters in China for selling knock-off sneakers. The shoemakers sold the judgment to Next Investments, which in trying to collect wanted the banks to freeze the counterfeiters' assets. Next complained that the banks dropped the ball and wanted $150 million in damages.
But U.S. District Chief Judge Colleen McMahon in an issue of first impression denied Next's contempt motion, ruling that "it seeks to hold the banks liable for violating orders that never bound them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250