In Retrial With Apple, WiLAN Scores $85M Patent Verdict
Represented by McKool Smith, the Canadian IP monetization company had won $145 million the first time around in a fight over voice-over-LTE technology. But it decided to try again after Apple offered only $10 million to end the case.
January 24, 2020 at 08:50 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Canadian IP holding company WiLAN Inc. has taken a haircut in a patent retrial with Apple Inc. over voice-over-LTE (VOLTE) technology.
But it's a haircut almost any patent owner would gladly accept. A San Diego jury handed Ottawa-based WiLAN an $85 million award for infringement on Friday.
That's less than the $145 million verdict WiLAN had won in 2018 that was later set aside by U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw. But it's a lot more than the $10 million that Apple said last year should be the maximum award.
"This was an important trial to determine the jury's award of damages for the infringement of WiLAN's novel wireless patents," said Mike McKool, chairman of McKool Smith and part of WiLAN's trial team. "The jury worked hard to weigh the evidence in this case and our client is very pleased with the verdict."
U.S. Patents 8,457,145 and 8,537,757 originated at San Diego startup Ensemble Communications. WiLAN's Chief Technology Officer Ken Stanwood is the named inventor on the patents, which help 4G cellular devices make uninterrupted high-quality voice calls while simultaneously uploading and downloading data for applications.
WiLAN acquired Ensemble and its IP in the early 2000s and Stanwood now serves as CTO of WiLAN, which is a subsidiary of Quarterhill Inc. The company sued Apple in 2014, alleging that various versions of the iPhone 6 and 7 infringed the patents.
Following the 2018 verdict, Sabraw upheld the jury's finding of infringement but ruled that WiLAN had improperly claimed damages for all of VOLTE, whereas Ensemble had invented only part of it. He ordered the company to accept Apple's offer of $10 million or elect a new trial on damages. Wi-LAN chose the latter.
Apple argued before and during the retrial that WiLAN has never properly apportioned the value of its technology from the accused iPhones. "JMOL of zero damages thus should be entered in Apple's favor," the company argued in a brief filed Wednesday.
McKool Smith's team also included partners Scott Cole, Brett Cooper, Warren Lipschitz, Ashley Moore, Jonathan Yim and Seth Hasenour, and associates Christopher McNett and Drew Hollander.
Apple was represented by DLA Piper.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: After a 74-Day Trial, Shook Fends Off Claims From Artist’s Heirs Against UMB Bank
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
‘It's Your Funeral’: Avoiding Doing Damage to Your Client’s Case With Uncivil Behavior
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250